Quantum singularity reactor: theoretically possible?

Tisthammerw
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
I’ve seen quantum singularity reactors on Star Trek and Babylon 5, and I’ve got a few questions. First of course, are they theoretically possible? How would they work exactly? And how much power could they generate? (One such reactor on a starship in Babylon 5 generates 330 exawatts, for instance, though I don’t know if such a thing is possible.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tisthammerw said:
I’ve seen quantum singularity reactors on Star Trek and Babylon 5, and I’ve got a few questions. First of course, are they theoretically possible? How would they work exactly? And how much power could they generate? (One such reactor on a starship in Babylon 5 generates 330 exawatts, for instance, though I don’t know if such a thing is possible.)

What is a quantum singularity reactor? : )


Seratend.
 
Sounds extremely interesting...All this fcience-siction is driving me crazy... :-p

Daniel.
 
Tisthammerw said:
I’ve seen quantum singularity reactors on Star Trek and Babylon 5, and I’ve got a few questions. First of course, are they theoretically possible? How would they work exactly? And how much power could they generate? (One such reactor on a starship in Babylon 5 generates 330 exawatts, for instance, though I don’t know if such a thing is possible.)

Cool! Just what I need to power my tardis. Those flux capacitors really eat the exawatts! :biggrin:
 
seratend said:
What is a quantum singularity reactor? : )


Seratend.

The little I have read on it suggests it's the same as what goes inside a black hole, some kind of artificial gravity well. A singularity is a point in space in which physical laws supposedly break down. Matter is continuously fed into the singularity, and this somehow causes an enormous energy release to be used. I have heard it claim to be even more efficient and powerful than a matter/antimatter reactor, which I found interesting. As you may know, a matter/antimatter reactor would yield roughly 90,000 terajoules per kilogram of mass, so the possibility of being more powerful and efficient than a matter/antimatter reactor intrigued me.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
605
Back
Top