Basics of Inequalities: Solving |x-1| - |x| + |2x+3| > 2x +4

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the inequality |x-1| - |x| + |2x+3| > 2x + 4 by applying the properties of absolute values. Participants clarify the conditions for |x| > a and |x| < a, emphasizing the need to consider different cases based on the value of x. The suggested approach involves breaking the inequality into cases, such as x ≤ -2 and others, to analyze each scenario. Some cases may lead to contradictions, highlighting the complexity of the problem. Overall, the conversation aims to deepen the understanding of absolute value inequalities and their solutions.
Kartik.
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Can we explain the meaning of the modulus(absolute value) with these equations?
|x| > a
=>x > a or x < -a(if a \in R+ and x \in R if a \in R-
|x|<a
=> -a < x < a if a \in R+ and no solution if a \in R-\cup{0}
If yes, then examples please?(for instances in x and a)
Blindly apply these equations we can solve |x-1| >= 3 as x-1<= -3 or x-1 >=3
If yes then how can we solve a inequality like |x-1| - |x| + |2x+3| > 2x +4 using the same logical statements above?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Kartik. said:
Can we explain the meaning of the modulus(absolute value) with these equations?
|x| > a
=>x > a or x < -a (if a \in R+ and x \in R if a \in R-
|x|<a
=> -a < x < a if a \in R+ and no solution if a \in R-\cup{0}
Yes, that all looks right except:
|x| > a => x > a or x < -a (if a \in R+\cup{0}) and etc.
(or, more simply, if a >= 0).
how can we solve a inequality like |x-1| - |x| + |2x+3| > 2x +4 using the same logical statements above?
Easiest way is to break it into the different cases: x <= -2, -2 <= x <= -3/2, -3/2 <= x <= 0, 0 <= x <= 1, x >= 1.
E.g.: x <= -2:
-(x-1) - (-x) + (-2x-3) > 2x + 4
Some of these will produce contradictions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top