A question about the double slit experiment

Fiziqs
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
Just a thought. In the double slit experiment, is it possible that the particles don't actually interfere with themselves, but rather they encounter interference from all the other particles which either already have been, or subsequently will be sent through the experiment. After all, for the results to show a definite pattern it is necessary to pass many particles through the apparatus, and although the setup displaces each particle in time, it doesn't displace them in space. They all occur in the same place, but at different times. But if the particles exist outside of time, then not displacing them in space means that they will all be passing through the experiment at the same time. Perhaps if the experimenter moved the apparatus inbetween each particle then the interference pattern would disappear.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Short answer = no.
"Interference" in the 2-slit experiment is an emergent property of the underlying dynamics.

Note: we can do the experiment at arbitrarily low rates (in principle - we could send one particle through the apparatus a year, say, or a decade, without affecting the emerging pattern). How does a particle released today get interfered with by a particle that gets released many years from now? What happens if we change our mind and discontinue the experiment after releasing only one particle?

Perhaps if the experimenter moved the apparatus inbetween each particle then the interference pattern would disappear.
"The apparatus" is the source+screen+slits ... makes no difference.

The slits act to measure the position of the particle, which makes it's momentum uncertain in relation to how precise the measurement is. The system ends up in a superposition of states - one for each slit - which tells us the details of how the momentum is uncertain. It is this that produces the appearance of interference.

See ]Marcella T, Quantum Interference with Slits for a complete treatment.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top