Trouble Deriving a Constant Acceleration Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time it takes for a car to cross a 30 m intersection while accelerating from rest at 2.00 m/s². The initial attempt to derive the formula was flawed due to incorrect assumptions about velocity and algebraic errors. It was clarified that the average velocity in constant acceleration scenarios is half the sum of the initial and final velocities, leading to the correct distance formula. The correct approach involves using the kinematic equations derived from calculus, emphasizing the need for proper understanding of these concepts. Understanding and applying the correct formulas is crucial for solving such physics problems accurately.
berenmacbowma
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Q: How long does it take a car to cross a 30 m-wide intersection after the light turns green, if it accelerates from rest at a constant 2.00 m/s^2?

Attempt: V=V0 + at; x-x0/t=v0+at; x-x0=v0+at^2; x=v0+x0+at^2; 30=0+0+2t^2; 15=t^2.

The square root of 15 ended up being my final answer, when the real answer was closer to 5.48 seconds. I just started physics, so I need to know what I personally did wrong when USING the formula I attempted to use. Giving me a different formula won't be helpful, because it won't tell me what I did wrong, and because my book has a whole chart of formulas I could refer to. If someone could explain to me how I derived that formula incorrectly, it would be a load of help. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You derived the formula incorrectly by assuming that velocity at time t is displacement/time. That it is not true when velocity is not constant. To compound the problem, your algebra is wrong in equation 3, but it doesn't matter since equation 2 is wrong.The kinematic equations are best derived form the calculus, check out a good website for this. You might want to refer to the chart of formulas in the book, and you will discover that none of them are the same as the one you derived.
 
berenmacbowma said:
Q: How long does it take a car to cross a 30 m-wide intersection after the light turns green, if it accelerates from rest at a constant 2.00 m/s^2?

Attempt: V=V0 + at; x-x0/t=v0+at

Right there; that does not follow. The only way you're going to be able to make the correct step is through integration, which if you're not familiar with isn't going to be possible at all.
 
You can avoid integration by noting that in a constant acceleration situation, average velocity for any time period equals half the sum of the starting and ending velocities.

average veloctiy = av = 1/2 (v0 + v1)
v1 = v0 + at
av = 1/2 (v0 + (v0 + at))
av = 1/2 (2v0 + at)
av = v0 + 1/2 a t

then distance equals x0 + average velocity x time:

x = x0 + av t = x0 + (v0 + 1/2 a t) t
x = x0 + v0 t + 1/2 a t2
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Why is speed constant when centripetal acceleration is constant?
Replies
24
Views
3K
I Coriolis acceleration of a projectile launched at the equator
Replies
4
Views
2K
Constant 1 g acceleration problem
Replies
11
Views
2K
B Kinematic equations ##\textbf{purely}## from graphs
Replies
49
Views
3K
What constant acceleration do you need to catch up?
Replies
4
Views
4K
B Verifying AI Chatbot's Answer on Brachistochrone Curve Formula
Replies
9
Views
2K
Irodov 1.23 confusion: Calculate distance traveled and time elapsed for this decelerating particle
Replies
2
Views
865
B How to Calculate Power and Torque for a 15kg Load at 15 RPM?
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Kinetic Energy derivation assumption?
Replies
11
Views
2K
B Applying the distance formula d= v*t + 1/2a*t^2
Replies
5
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top