Solving 2D Kinematics Problem: Distance OP in m

  • Thread starter Thread starter shlh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves an arrow shot horizontally towards point O, which is 20.0 m away, hitting point P below O after 0.10 seconds. The key to solving the problem lies in understanding that the vertical motion of the arrow is influenced by gravity, with an acceleration of 9.8 m/s². Since the initial vertical velocity is zero, the distance OP can be calculated using the formula for free fall: x = 0.5*a*t². By substituting the values, the distance OP can be determined. This scenario emphasizes the importance of analyzing kinematics in one dimension, particularly in the vertical direction.
shlh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with this question.
An arrow is shot horizontally towards point O, which is at a distance of 20.0 m. It hits point P (right below point O) 0.10 s later. What is the distance OP (in metres)?
What do i need to find? How would i know the time taken for the arrow to reach o?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The distance to the target is a red herring; this is a question of kinematics in 1D: the vertical dimension.

You know the arrow has been in free fall for 0.10s, and when something is in free-fall it accelerates downwards at 9.8 m/s^2. Since the arrow was shot horizontally, it's initial downward velocity is zero, and you can use

x = 0.5*a*t^2 + v*t

to find your distance.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top