Can Integrals Take Different Values Without Being Equal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rs123
  • Start date Start date
rs123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Apologies if this is stupid question, but I have the following situation. Given two measures u(x) and v(x) if u(x) is absolutely continuous to v(x) ( u<<v) I have a result such that

\int_A f(x)dv(x) always takes the value \int_B g(x)du(x)

But strictly \int_B g(x)du(x)\neq\int_A f(x)dv(x)

If that makes sense... Basically I want to express this idea of 'taking the value of without being equal' but don't know how to express it mathematically (in words and symbols).

In case it still isn't clear, performing the first integral will necessarily return the value of the second, but performing the second will never give the value of the first. It appears to be a non symmetric equality.. Or is this nonsense?!

I then want to contrast this to when the measures are equivalent (u(x)\sim v(x)) when the two integrals are equal y'see.

Many thanks!

R
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
rs123 said:
Or is this nonsense?!
I'm afraid yes. Equality of values is always symmetric.

If the integrals take a value, then they are equal. E.g. ##\int_0^1 \frac{x}{2}\,dx = \int_0^1 x^3\,dx## even though the functions are different. But as functions, e.g. if the areas of integration ##A,B## are variable, then two functions can be identical almost everywhere: ##F(x) =_{a.e.} G(x)## or ##F(x)=G(x)\;(a.e.)\,.##
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top