Need help with pythagoras equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter krislemon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pythagoras
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how to handle square roots when solving equations, particularly in the context of Pythagorean equations. Participants emphasize the importance of squaring both sides of an equation to eliminate square roots, while also noting the necessity of checking solutions against the original equation to avoid extraneous results. The concept of square roots as multivalued functions is introduced, clarifying that the principal square root is defined to be non-negative. Additionally, resources like Wikipedia are suggested for further reading on the theory behind square roots. The conversation highlights the need for a solid grasp of these mathematical principles to solve related problems effectively.
krislemon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I need help with an explanation of how to deal with squareroots when solving equations.
E.g. Look at the uploaded bmp.file and solve for x. Please I would like to have a full step by step method on how to deal with this type of equations in general. Thank you
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
krislemon said:
Hi,

I need help with an explanation of how to deal with squareroots when solving equations.
E.g. Look at the uploaded bmp.file and solve for x. Please I would like to have a full step by step method on how to deal with this type of equations in general. Thank you

Sorry but it's forum rules that we can't just give you a full step by step solution. You need to show you've put some effort into the problem yourself.

Start by squaring both sides, then show us what you've done.
 
ok.
I managed to solve the problem so I will just ask about the squareroot.
Where can I find the theory/rule of canceling squareroot? e.g. (squareroot of x)^2.
 
krislemon said:
Where can I find the theory/rule of canceling squareroot? e.g. (squareroot of x)^2.

I'm not sure what you're asking exactly. The theory of cancelling the square root? Squaring is the inverse of the square root (cancelling the square root) as you've shown.

If you want to read a bit more on square roots, maybe try wikipedia? Or you'll need to be more specific.
 
When solving problems of this kind, one can square both sides and manipulate until no square roots remain. But when squaring, the implication goes only forward. Therefore, one must check all solutions one finds by inserting them into the original equation.

For example, squaring the equation ##\sqrt x =-1## gives ##x=1##. The first equation can therefore have no solution other than ##x=1##. But if we insert this in the first eqaution, we obtain ##\sqrt 1=-1##, which is false. Therefore, ##x=1## is not a solution either, so the first equation has no solutions.
 
Erland said:
When solving problems of this kind, one can square both sides and manipulate until no square roots remain. But when squaring, the implication goes only forward. Therefore, one must check all solutions one finds by inserting them into the original equation.

For example, squaring the equation ##\sqrt x =-1## gives ##x=1##. The first equation can therefore have no solution other than ##x=1##. But if we insert this in the first eqaution, we obtain ##\sqrt 1=-1##, which is false. Therefore, ##x=1## is not a solution either, so the first equation has no solutions.

I hope you took the square root function in the sense of the principal branch, for if you did not, we have that \sqrt{} is a multivalued function, having precisely two values for every real number other than 0, and it is one-valued for 0. Taking the square root as multivalued yields -1\in \sqrt{1}, which is true, for (-1)^2=1. However, the square root in the principal branch is defined as the positive answer to the multivalued square root, making it one-valued. In general, \sqrt[n]{} is a multivalued function, having n values for all complex numbers and 1 for 0. For example, the real number 2 has three cube roots: \sqrt[3]{2} which is the positive root, and two complex roots: \displaystyle -\frac{\sqrt[3]{2}}{2}+\frac{\sqrt[3]{2}\sqrt{3}}{2}i and \displaystyle -\frac{\sqrt[3]{2}}{2}-\frac{\sqrt[3]{2}\sqrt{3}}{2}i. We avoid this problem by defining the result of a rooting operation to satisfy these if x is real:

\sqrt[n]{x}'s principal branch value is defined so as to be the unique real number a satisfying a\in\sqrt[n_m]{x} and a\geq 0, where \sqrt[n_m]{} denotes the multivalued version of the nth root.

I just wanted to point that out to avoid confusion.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top