New Math Hobbyist needs help with direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Rev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
AI Thread Summary
To build a solid foundation in mathematics as a hobbyist, it is essential to study calculus and linear algebra first. Recommended resources include Courant's "What is Mathematics?" and Kline's "Mathematics for the Non-Mathematician," followed by books like "Discrete Mathematics" by Norman Biggs and "Principles of Mathematics" by Allendoerfer and Oakley. Exploring online courses, such as those offered by MIT, can provide structured learning and community support. Additionally, studying logic and proof can enhance understanding and appreciation of mathematical concepts. Engaging with these subjects will pave the way for exploring higher-level mathematics.
The Rev
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hi. I've recently gotten interested in mathematics as a hobby, but I'm not sure what I should be studying in what order. I remember in High School we had Algebra I, then Geometry, then Algebra II, then Trig, then Pre-calc and so on. However, we never studied the really cool stuff (like multi-dimensional geometry, theoretical math, etc.), and I was wondering what subjects I need to study, in what order, to build a foundation for those higher math subjects.

I also need to find out what higher math subjects are available to study. (I really know very little about math beyond my basic algebra and geometry in High School, and having seen Good Will Hunting two or three times :blushing: ).

Anyway, any direction, help, advice, criticism, or good wishes are appreciated.

BTW, right now I am reading through two books, Courant's "What is Mathematics?" and Kline's "Mathematics for the Non-Mathematician" as general mathematics primers, but after that, I'm not sure what a good next step will be.

Anyway, thanks for the help!

:approve:

The Rev
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Two areas you need to learn about:
1) Calculus
2) Linear algebra
 
I just came across a book that I think is right up your alley: "Discrete Mathematics" by Norman Biggs. You can search through the book online. It's written for undergrads as an introduction to "higher maths". It has plenty of worked examples and problems- always a plus for self-study. It reads easily and looks rewarding.
mathwonk always recommends a book called "Principles of Mathematics" by Allendoerfer and Oakley. It's out of print, but you can find it used online (try amazon zshops, ebay, and bigwords.com).
What I read of "Mathematics: Its Content, Methods, and Meanings" was fascinating. It introduces a wide range of topics, so you may discover something that especially interests you. I think it's similar to "What is Mathematics".
I think logic helps with everything else. "Deduction: Introductory Symbolic Logic" looks nice- clean and modern, not too much boring extra crap. It doesn't assume any prior knowledge of logic (hence the "Introductory" bit :rolleyes:), uses both trees and natural deduction, and includes Modal and Free logics. I don't like Copi and Cohen's "Introduction to Logic", though it's supposedly the standard (in its 12th edition or something)- I think it has too much boring extra crap.
If you search this site, there are plenty of "what's a good book for learning [blank]?" threads.
You could also check out the math courses on
http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/index.htm. Their linear algebra professor, Gilbert Strang, is supposed to be excellent- he has video lectures online too. I think they also have forums for courses so students working through a course independently can help each other.
Simply browsing through a few course catalogs (most are online), noting the prerequisites and such, should give you a good idea of in which order subjects should be studied.
This http://www.math.niu.edu/~rusin/known-math/index/tour.html page, from the same site as above, more easy to navigate through than the tour.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Calculus is my main suggestion, it should be enough to keep you busy.

Also of interest: logic and proof. It can be interesting to look back at high school geometry with newfound mathematical maturity, and appreciate the qualities of an elegant proof.
 
Wow! Thanks for all the help, everyone (especially honestrosewater - great list of books and links - you get an extra thumb up :) ). I appreciate this, immensely!

:approve:

The Rev
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Back
Top