Photons violate Uncertainty Principle?

sarvesh0303
Messages
61
Reaction score
2
A photon is considered as a quantum particle, right?
However since we know the speed of a photon(speed of light) and hence can predict its position, isn't it violating the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle?
Where am I going wrong? Is it false to believe that a photon is a quantum particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
isnt it momentum vs position? so even though we know its speed we might be limited in knowing its momentum (ie wavelength or its frequency) .
 
It's a bit difficult to talk about a photon's position since there doesn't exist a well-defined position operator for a photon.

For massive particles, there is a position operator, fulfilling the Heisenberg algebra
[\hat{x}_i,\hat{p}_j]=\mathrm{i} \hbar \delta_{ij}.
Then for any pure or mixed state the Heisenberg-Robertson uncertainty relation,
\Delta x_i \Delta x_j \geq \frac{\hbar}{2} \delta_{ij}
holds. I tells you that the position and momentum of the particle both are not fully determined but distributed with a finite standard deviation, and the product of these standard deviations cannot be smaller than \hbar/2 if you consider position and momentum components in the same direction.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top