Does the Curl Relationship Exist in Both Directions for Vector Fields?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between vector fields and their curls in electrodynamics, specifically regarding magnetic potential. The initial claim suggested that if B is the curl of A, then A could also be expressed as the curl of B. However, it was clarified that this is incorrect, and the relationship does not exist in both directions. The final consensus is that the curl relationship is not reversible. This conclusion emphasizes the importance of understanding the properties of vector fields in electrodynamics.
hisotaso
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
hisotaso said:
We are studying electrodynamics, more specifically magnetic potential. We are given

B=∇xA

I saw on a certain website here http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~jstiles/220/handouts/The Magnetic Vector Potential.pdf that

A=∇xB

So is it true in general that for a vector field, the curl relationship exists in both directions as shown above?


Where does it say A=∇xB?

This is wrong.
 
Looks like I read it wrong. My mistake. Back to my question: the answer is no?
 
Yep. The answer in no.
 
Thank you.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top