How does the finite size of an obstacle affect diffraction patterns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Talker1500
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how the finite size of an obstacle, much smaller than the wavelength of light, affects diffraction patterns. The original poster questions the applicability of Huygens-Fresnel theory due to the size constraints of the obstacle, such as a 1nm sphere or a 2nm cube, compared to a 500nm wavelength. Participants mention Rayleigh scattering, noting that while the shape may not significantly impact the pattern, the intensity's dependence on the size (d^6) raises concerns about the accuracy of this approach. There is a consensus that a more nuanced understanding of the obstacle's shape is necessary for accurate predictions. Overall, the finite size of the obstacle plays a critical role in determining the resulting diffraction pattern.
Talker1500
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm considering the case of diffraction by an object, with dimensions far smaller than the wavelenght of the light source. If I consider for example an sphere with radius 1nm, or a cube with edge length a≈2nm , and the usual λ≈500nm, how will the finite shape of the obstacle be of significance to the interference pattern?

I thought about using Hyugens-Fresnel theory, but it implies that the size of the obstacle is far greater than the λ, so I'm not sure as to how to approach this situation.

Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
Rayleigh scattering describes this.
I would expect that the precise shape is not relevant, as long as the amount of material does not change it should be similar to a sphere.
 
I considered Rayleigh scattering, but the fact that the intensity is proportional to d^6 without taking into account the shape of the obstacle makes this approach questionable. The factor d^6 would imply that a tiny change in the characteristic length of the obstacle would increase the intensity way too much. And directly not considering the shape of the obstacle even if it's small is just not good enough.
 
Back
Top