Entanglement between particles that did not coexist (at the same time)

San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
entanglement between particles that do not coexist (at the same time)

In the paper by eisenberg et. el.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.4191

Photon 1 and 2 are entangled.
Then 1 is measured, say spin up. The measurement, naturally, "destroys" photon 1.

Then at a (slightly) later time an entangled pair of 3 & 4 is created.

Then photon 2 is entangled with photon 3.

Photon 1 and 4 are considered to be entangled when 2 is entangled with 3. This is known as entanglement swapping.

However 1 was destroyed. Thus it became determinate (say spin up) at the time of destruction.

In entanglement, as we know, the particles are in an indeterminate state (before measurement).

Question 1: Is 4 in an indeterminate state (while assumed entangled with the destroyed 1) when 2 and 3 are entangled?

Question 2: if we did a separate experiment where photon 2 was measured and let's say it came spin up. (and there was/is no photon 1 in this experiment).

Then 2 was entangled with 3 (which is currently entangled with 4),

what would the spin of 4 turn out to be on measurement? ...in this case/experiement
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
information on destruction of a photon

is information, not-necessarily, considered extracted/gleaned/taken when a photon is destroyed?

...in the case of standard entanglement or entanglement swapping or any kind of entanglement...
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top