Generate a Multivariate Random Variable

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on generating multivariate random variables that follow a specific extreme-value distribution defined by a given cumulative distribution function (CDF). The user outlines a method involving the marginal and conditional distributions to derive random variables x1 and x2. They note that while the method initially seemed effective, the simulation results show a significant discrepancy in the average values of x1 and x2, which should be symmetric. A key point raised is the dependence between x1 and x2, suggesting that their correlation needs to be accounted for in the random variable generation process. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the variables to accurately compute their covariance.
Jeffack
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm an economics graduate student doing some work on a nested logit model.

I am trying to generate random variables that follow the following CDF:
F(x_1, x_2) =\textrm{exp}[ -(e^{-2x_1}+e^{-2x_2}) ^{1/2}]
(This is an extreme-value distribution)

With a single random variable, I know that (assuming you can invert the CDF), you can just draw ##u## from the Uniform [0,1] distribution and do ##x=F^{-1}(u)## to get a random variable that follows the distribution described by ##F(x)##.

With the multivariate case, I think what I need to do is:

1) Find ## F_{x_1}(x_1, x_2)##, the marginal distribution of ##F(x_1, x_2)##. I do this by taking the limit as ##x_2## goes to infinity, so ## F_{x_1}(x_1, x_2)=\textrm{exp}[ -(e^{-2x_1}) ^{1/2}]##

2) Find ## F(x_1, x_2 | x_1)##, the conditional distribution of ##F(x_1, x_2)## given ##x_1##. This is calculated this way: ## F(x_1, x_2 | x_1)= {\frac{F(x_1, x_2)}{F_{x_1}(x_1, x_2)}} ##

3) Invert ## F_{x_1}(x_1, x_2)=u_1## to get ## F_{x_1}^{-1}(u)=x_1 ##. This gives us a random ##x_1## for an value of ##u_1 \in (0,1) ##

4) Use the value of ##x_1## generated in the previous step in this step. Invert ## F(x_1, x_2 | x_1)=u_2 ## to get ## F^{-1}(u_2)=x_2##

Here are the formulas I use for determining the random variables (Sorry they're not all pretty and Latex-y... I pulled them from Excel)

x_1=(LN((LN(u_1))^2))/-2

x_2=(LN(((LN(u_2*(EXP(-1*((EXP(-2*x_1))^(1/2))))))/-1)^2-(EXP(-2*x_1))))/-2

I did all of these steps and, at first, thought I got a decent result; As long as I pick ##u##'s that are between 0 and 1, I get a real answer; larger u's generate larger x's; and u's that are arbitrarily close to zero (one) give x's that are very small (large). However, when I ran a simulation and looked at average values of each, my ##x_1##'s tend to be much larger than my ##x_2##'s (about .66 for ##x_1## and -.1 for ##x_2##. Since the CDF is symmetric, I think that these variables should have the same average.

Any help will be much appreciated. This is my first post ever on this site!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Jeffack and welcome to the forums.

A key question you need to answer: Are x1 and x2 independent variables or are they dependent? (If the limits of integration are tied up or if you have correlation or one variable has the property of being a function of the other then you have dependence).
 
I think that, based on the CDF, the variables are dependent, correct? The conditional density of ##x_2## depends on the value of ##x_1##.
 
Yes I agree with you but once you find the relationship between X1 and f(X1) = X2 then you calculate Cov(X1,X2) = E[X1*X2] - E[X1]E[X2] = E[X1*f(X1)] - E[X1]*E[f(X1)] using only the PDF for X1.
 
Thanks for your help. The variables are definitely correlated. Now I just need to figure out how to generate the random variables.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top