How do you melt a car using a building?

In summary, a new London skyscraper nicknamed the "Walkie-Talkie" has caused controversy after its curved design was found to reflect and concentrate sunlight, melting parts of a car parked nearby. The architect responsible for the design, Rafael Viñoly, has also been involved in a similar incident in Las Vegas and is currently working on another project in Abu Dhabi. Some have joked about the building's potential as a "death ray" and have pointed out the dangers of not considering the effects of sunlight in architectural designs.
  • #1
jtbell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
15,926
5,734
By using a bit of creative architecture!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-23930675

A new London skyscraper dubbed the "Walkie-Talkie" has been blamed for reflecting light which melted parts of a car parked on a nearby street.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Who had the bright idea (pun intended) to shape the side of a building like this?

article-1084279-041065E40000044D-19_468x408.jpg
TV interview with an solar physicist:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
D H said:
Who had the bright idea (pun intended) to shape the side of a building like this?
Me, a while ago, but they beat me to it. Centrally controllable sun deflectors at the windows would allow you to point your death ray in the desired direction... muahahahah...
 
  • #4
If Tesla would still be alive he would sue them for stealing his patent on death ray... :D
 
  • #5
D H said:
Who had the bright idea (pun intended) to shape the side of a building like this?
I laughed pretty hard when I saw this story this morning. Anyone who has taken even one course in optics would be able to figure out what was going to happen when you point a concave surface at the sun.

The Walt Disney Concert Hall had a similar problem but they solved it by sanding the surfaces to dull them. This one will probably be a lot tougher to solve - I don't think that they will be willing to sand the windows.

D H said:

That's a great one DH! Too funny. :rofl:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
Nah, I think the priority on the Sun-powered heat ray rests firmly with Archimedes of Syracuse.
 
  • #7
D H said:
Who had the bright idea (pun intended) to shape the side of a building like this?

article-1084279-041065E40000044D-19_468x408.jpg
If they would have just built it like it is shown in this picture with the windows vertical, there wouldn't be a problem; of course it wouldn't look as cool.
 
  • #8
Definitely plagiarism.

800px-Four_solaire_001.jpg
 
  • #9
A melted Jaguar is a shame. But next thing could be a fuel truck, a corn transporter or an ice cream van.
 
  • #10
Crazymechanic said:
If Tesla would still be alive he would sue them for stealing his patent on death ray... :D

I'm pretty sure the Greeks call prior art on that one.
 
  • #11
A.T. said:
A melted Jaguar is a shame. But next thing could be a fuel truck, a corn transporter or an ice cream van.

You're forgetting about the Gingers; they'll burn up like vampires.
 
  • #12
The Brits have some form over this sort of mistake. The history faculty building at Cambridge univ. (built in the 1960s) was designed to make full use of natural north-facing light. Unfortunately, something got screwed up and they actually built it with the plan rotated through 180 degrees, so all that glass gets full sunshine all day!

There were endless problems with cracked glass panes, water leaks, etc - not to mention a steady stream of ambulances carrying away historians with heatstroke.

800px-History_Faculty_University_of_Cambridge.jpg


At least they found out about the "walkie talkie" while the builders were still there. Given the usual british climate, there might not have been any problems before the warranty had expired!
 
  • #13
Crazymechanic said:
If Tesla would still be alive he would sue them for stealing his patent on death ray... :D

Have you never heard of the Las Vegas death ray hotel?

Same principle: Curved building, heated floor/pool/tourist, clueless architects.
 
  • #14
Of all places on Earth to put an enormous concave lens, I would think London would be the safest. When did they start getting sunshine there?
 
  • #15
Architects should always have adult supervision lest they commit malpractice.
 
  • #16
Cthugha said:
Have you never heard of the Las Vegas death ray hotel?

Same principle: Curved building, heated floor/pool/tourist, clueless architects.
After chasing this building down, I have a correction for you. You said clueless architects. You should have said clueless architect. Singular. The same person, Rafael Viñoly, designed both buildings.

And now he's designing another, this time in Abu Dhabi.

Al-Raha-Beach-general-7-e1270048154833.jpg
 
  • #17
D H said:
After chasing this building down, I have a correction for you. You said clueless architects. You should have said clueless architect. Singular. The same person, Rafael Viñoly, designed both buildings.

The inventor of the "fry-scraper".
 
  • #18
D H said:
After chasing this building down, I have a correction for you. You said clueless architects. You should have said clueless architect. Singular. The same person, Rafael Viñoly, designed both buildings.

And now he's designing another, this time in Abu Dhabi.

Wow. I am not sure whether I should be glad now that it is not a whole generation of architects building superlenses or whether I am amazed that he did not learn. At least Abu Dhabi is an ambitious project. There is so much sunlight that he might be able to create some real damage this time.
 
  • #19
nsaspook said:
The inventor of the "fry-scraper".
:rofl:
 
  • #20
D H said:
After chasing this building down, I have a correction for you. You said clueless architects. You should have said clueless architect. Singular. The same person, Rafael Viñoly, designed both buildings.

And now he's designing another, this time in Abu Dhabi.

First time I've seen a Wikipedia biography page with a "Death Ray" entry :thumbs:
 
  • #21
nsaspook said:
The inventor of the "fry-scraper".

Seen here as a kid, playing with ants:

http://www.breakfront.com/Portals/38894/images/Boy%20Burning%20Ant.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. How does the building contribute to melting a car?

The building serves as a reflective surface, allowing the sun's rays to be focused and concentrated onto the car, increasing the temperature and aiding in the melting process.

2. Can any building be used to melt a car?

No, not all buildings are suitable for this purpose. The building must have a smooth and reflective surface, as well as be positioned in a way that allows for maximum exposure to the sun's rays.

3. How long does it take to melt a car using a building?

The amount of time it takes to melt a car using a building will vary depending on factors such as the intensity of the sun's rays, the reflective properties of the building, and the size and material of the car. In ideal conditions, it could take anywhere from a few hours to a full day.

4. Are there any safety precautions that need to be taken when using a building to melt a car?

Yes, it is important to take precautions when attempting to melt a car using a building. The building's surface can become extremely hot, so it is important to wear protective gear and avoid touching the building during the process. It is also important to make sure the area is clear of any flammable materials.

5. Is melting a car using a building a sustainable or environmentally friendly method?

No, this method of melting a car is not sustainable or environmentally friendly. It requires the use of non-renewable resources, such as fossil fuels, to create the materials for the building and the car. It also produces air pollution and contributes to climate change.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
6
Replies
195
Views
21K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top