Predict the sign for delta Ssys CH3CH2CH3(g) +5O2(g)-> 3CO2(g) + 4H2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jbreezy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Sign
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on predicting the sign of delta Ssys for two chemical reactions. For the combustion reaction of CH3CH2CH3 with O2, the sign is predicted to be negative due to the formation of more stable products, indicating a decrease in entropy. In contrast, the decomposition of N2O5 into NO2 and NO3 is predicted to have a positive delta Ssys because it results in an increase in the number of gaseous molecules, which raises entropy. The key takeaway is that reactions leading to fewer gas molecules typically have a negative delta Ssys, while those producing more gas molecules have a positive delta Ssys. Understanding these principles is essential for predicting changes in entropy in chemical reactions.
Jbreezy
Messages
582
Reaction score
0
predict the sign for delta Ssys CH3CH2CH3(g) +5O2(g)---> 3CO2(g) + 4H2

Homework Statement



predict the sign for delta Ssys CH3CH2CH3(g) +5O2(g)---> 3CO2(g) + 4H20(l)


The same question for N205(g) --> NO2(g) + NO3(g)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I said the first was negative because it is combustion rxn and is more stable after the rxn.

The second one I said positive because now you have more molecules?

Good or no? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're looking for a change in entropy. In general, the system with a larger number of moles of gaseous molecules has the higher entropy.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top