Schools Graduate school MSc. - approaching a professor

AI Thread Summary
Navigating the transition from undergraduate studies in Physics to graduate school can be challenging, particularly in securing letters of recommendation and presenting academic transcripts. Concerns arise when a formal supervisor has limited involvement in a student's research, leading to hesitation in requesting a recommendation. It's advised to approach professors early, summarize accomplishments, and involve any post-docs or graduate students who had more direct interactions. Regarding academic transcripts, students must present all grades from their post-secondary education, including those from an Honours year, even if they are subpar. However, applications typically allow for explanations of outlier grades. When seeking permission from potential supervisors before applying, students are not expected to have a complete research proposal ready; this is usually developed during graduate studies. Nonetheless, scholarship applications may require a proposal, which can be discussed with potential advisors for guidance. Overall, addressing these concerns early and openly can alleviate some of the stress associated with the graduate school application process.
Renlireb
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have recently completed my undergraduate degree in Physics. While I have thoroughly enjoyed my last year, I feel like I am in quite a dilemma when approaching professors for graduate school.

I have spent the final year doing research in theoretical particle physics, however my formal supervisor, due to work constraints, was not able to be present for 90% of my research, and as a result I am reluctant to say that our interactions regarding my work has been not only been 'extremely limited' but also quite 'unsure' to say the least. Thus I am hesitant to request a letter of recommendation from this supervisor. I was wondering about students who were in a similar situation as I am in, about how they dealt with obtaining letter of recommendation.

Another question is related about presenting the academic transcript. My course is technically a undergraduate + Honours type. While the first 3 years of my undergraduate is enough for me to actually graduate with a Bachelor of Science with a major in Physics and Mathematics, with a perfect GPA. However, due to a very unfortunate mishap (my fault completely) in exam timetable memorization, I have almost missed an exam, and it is only by the good grace of my concerned friends that I am able to take the exam. Nonetheless, I arrived in a very bad state of mind and obtained a terrible score, to the point where I am ashamed to reveal my particular set of scores for my Honours year. Must I present all my scores to the potential supervisor, especially if the Honours year (while related) is not necessary for the enrollment of MSc? (EDIT: I should also mention that Honours year, my grades for other subjects have been subpar compared to my undergraduate, which is also a reason why I would not like to reveal it.)

As some of you might know, it is often a prerequisite to get the permission of a potential supervisor before you apply, however as I feel that my knowledge is still 'lacking'. I really do not know how to approach the problems given in the list of potential projects. When discussing options with the supervisor, is it expected that you give a guideline to how you will tackle the project?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Renlireb said:
I have spent the final year doing research in theoretical particle physics, however my formal supervisor, due to work constraints, was not able to be present for 90% of my research, and as a result I am reluctant to say that our interactions regarding my work has been not only been 'extremely limited' but also quite 'unsure' to say the least. Thus I am hesitant to request a letter of recommendation from this supervisor. I was wondering about students who were in a similar situation as I am in, about how they dealt with obtaining letter of recommendation.
Any professor who takes an undergraduate student onto a project is going to be well aware that student is going to want a reference letter at some point. I would recommend contacting the professor as early as possible with the request and be specific with deadlines. It might help to summarize what you have accomplished, what you learned and how you feel you have performed on the project. If there was a post-doc or graduate student who had a more direct relationship with you on the project - point that out and cc that person on any correspondence. Tell him or her what your specific goals are an ask whether this person is comfortable writing a letter or several letters to support you.

Another question is related about presenting the academic transcript. My course is technically a undergraduate + Honours type. While the first 3 years of my undergraduate is enough for me to actually graduate with a Bachelor of Science with a major in Physics and Mathematics, with a perfect GPA. However, due to a very unfortunate mishap (my fault completely) in exam timetable memorization, I have almost missed an exam, and it is only by the good grace of my concerned friends that I am able to take the exam. Nonetheless, I arrived in a very bad state of mind and obtained a terrible score, to the point where I am ashamed to reveal my particular set of scores for my Honours year. Must I present all my scores to the potential supervisor, especially if the Honours year (while related) is not necessary for the enrollment of MSc? (EDIT: I should also mention that Honours year, my grades for other subjects have been subpar compared to my undergraduate, which is also a reason why I would not like to reveal it.)
When applying to graduate school you don't get a choice in which marks to present. You are essentially required to present all transcripts from post-secondary school work you have done and the school you are applying to decides which grades are relevant. Failure to provide an accurate record of your marks is grounds for dismissal. Most applications will give you the opportunity to explain that one particular grade is an outlier though.

As some of you might know, it is often a prerequisite to get the permission of a potential supervisor before you apply, however as I feel that my knowledge is still 'lacking'. I really do not know how to approach the problems given in the list of potential projects. When discussing options with the supervisor, is it expected that you give a guideline to how you will tackle the project?

This can vary from school to school, but generally no, you are not expected to have a research proposal at the ready before you even get into graduate school. Most often this is developed as part of the graduate work and this becomes more important for a PhD (many schools will base at least a portion of the candidacy examination on the quality of a research proposal). That said, if you are applying for external scholarships, then, yes, you are likely to need something for the scholarship applications. This is something that you might discuss with potential advisors and they will often help you with it.
 
Thanks for the advice!

I am quite disappointed, but I guess there isn't really much I can do about my Honours marks at this time.

Yep, I asked because on the scholarship applications, they usually have a section devoted to a research proposal. I got the impression that a research proposal was required before you approach a professor. Hearing this made me much more relieved :)
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top