Can (x+y)^(1/2) be expanded using the binomial series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gentsagree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Expansion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of expanding (x+y)^(1/2) using the binomial series. It highlights that traditional binomial expansion applies only to integer exponents, while Newton's Generalized Binomial Theorem allows for non-integer exponents. A suggested approach is to factor out the larger variable and rewrite the expression in the form of (1+z)^(1/2), where z is a fraction. This method leads to an infinite series expansion for (1+z)^(1/2). Overall, the conversation emphasizes the applicability of generalized binomial expansion for non-integer cases.
gentsagree
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
Is it possible to do a binomial expansion of (x+y)^{1/2}? I tried to compute it with the factorial expression for the binomial coefficients, but the second term already has n=1/2 and k=1, which makes the calculation for the binomial coefficient (n 1) weird, I think.

Any advice?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You may want to look at something like
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_series

Assuming neither x or y are zero (and both are positive), I would recommend factoring out the larger of x or y and let your task reduce to that of finding (1+z)^{1/2} with z<1.

For example, assume y < x, then your expression would be

f = \sqrt{x}\,(1+z)^{1/2}

Expand (1+z)^{1/2} using the binomial series. The expansion will be an infinite series due to the non-integer exponent.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top