The dot or cross product of two operators acting on a state

Robert_G
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
If a system is made up by two subsystems, for example, the atom and the photon. and let's assume the state of the atoms is described by |\phi\rangle, while the state of the photons can be described by |n\rangle, The Kronecker product of the |\phi\rangle and |n\rangle can be used to describe the whole system. and that would be:

|\Psi\rangle=|\phi, n\rangle=|\phi\rangle\otimes|n\rangle

I always treat the |\phi\rangle and |n\rangle as vectors, so the operation of \otimes means the elements of the first vector (here |\phi\rangle) times the "whole" following vector which is |n\rangle here; that will gives us a vector which is |\phi, n\rangle. so if the numbers of the elements of |\phi\rangle and |n\rangle is m and n respectively, the vector |\phi, n\rangle has m\times n elements.

now for example, we have two operators, \hat{\mathbf{A}} and \hat{\mathbf{N}}, and they satisfy the following equations:
\hat{\mathbf{A}}|\phi\rangle=\mathbf{a}|\phi'\rangle
\hat{\mathbf{N}}|n\rangle=\mathbf{n}|n'\rangle.

Of course, \hat{\mathbf{A}} can only act on the atomic states, and \hat{\mathbf{N}} can only act on the photons states.

Now, my question, what is \hat{\mathbf{A}}\cdot \hat{\mathbf{N}}|\phi, n\rangle, and what is \hat{\mathbf{A}}\times \hat{\mathbf{N}}|\phi, n\rangle? The idea just not clear to me, if the operation \otimes is involved.
if \hat{U}=\hat{\mathbf{A}}\cdot \hat{\mathbf{N}}, for example, how to write \langle \phi, n|\;|U|^2\; |\phi', n'\rangle on the base of |\phi\rangle and |n\rangle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need the tensor product of operators. (See the section "Tensor product of linear maps".)
 
strangerep said:
You need the tensor product of operators. (See the section "Tensor product of linear maps".)

are you talking about a section of a book?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top