Uncovering the Mystery: The Disappearance of Sean Carroll

AI Thread Summary
Sean Carroll's tenure denial at the University of Chicago is attributed to a "stylistic clash" with some faculty members who disapprove of his research direction. Despite this setback, he is expected to have a successful career elsewhere due to his popularity and reputation as a leading cosmologist. The discussion emphasizes that departments must align their research focus, which may explain their decision. Speculation about the reasons behind his departure is deemed unproductive, as the department likely considered various factors. Ultimately, Carroll remains on the faculty for now but may seek opportunities elsewhere in the near future.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
robphy said:
... know what happened?

You gave the specific blog
http://preposterousuniverse.blogspo...erousuniverse_archive.html#111509098797695398

and here is a quote from it:
"I hadn't anticipated any problems at all. But apparently there are a few of our faculty who don't think much of my research. A stylistic clash, I imagine. "

So he SAYS it was some others in the department didnt like the direction or character of his research. I tend to believe what Sean says rather than look for hidden reasons that he does not say.

my feeling is that he will have a great career wherever he goes. he is smart and popular, has lots of colleagues that like him and will connect him to some excellent position. he is also something of a celebrity cosmologist, much invited to give talks at all kinds of conferences. he will be a big asset to whatever Astronomy department he fits into

my feeling is that it doesn't really accomplish anything to speculate about why UChicago department didnt want him as their permanent resident celebrity cosmologist. if they didnt like his brand of cosmology and wanted to move in a different direction then that is their perogative. Departments have to decide what their makeup and the main thrust of their research is going to be.

Let's look and see what cosmologist they get INSTEAD and maybe that will be a clue.

I don't want to judge them. Obviously they gave up a world-class star cosmologist, whom everybody likes as a person, and they must realize this, and they must have had some other consideration that balanced it.
 
Last edited:
The only thing I can come up with is maybe the board asked who is the leading cosmetologist and Sean didn't make the cut.
 
turbo-1 said:
The only thing I can come up with is maybe the board asked who is the leading cosmetologist and Sean didn't make the cut.

at least that fits with what he said about a "stylistic clash"
:rolleyes:
 
That is sad news. I think he is a visionary. Did Jennifer Chen depart as well?
 
Chronos said:
That is sad news. I think he is a visionary. Did Jennifer Chen depart as well?

I found it sad too. Someone else will have to answer your question about her because I don't know anything besides what he said at the blog. However I do not think that either of them has left Chicago. Sean is still on the faculty. I think the department's refusing to grant him tenure simply means that over the next year he will probably get some nice offers from other places and he will resign his position at UChic. and move somewhere else. Not getting tenure is not like getting fired, it is like NOT getting a promotion that you expected.
 
marcus said:
at least that fits with what he said about a "stylistic clash"
:rolleyes:
Marcus, you got the pun, so you "made the cut". I wanted to throw in a smilie, but that would have made it too obvious.
 
Back
Top