Can 12 People Share 3 Tables in 5 Days for Dinner?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xamfy19
  • Start date Start date
Xamfy19
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Hello All;
Please help solve the following question:
12 people use a dining room with 3 tables. Each table can sit 4 person. How to arrnage the seatings in 5 days so that each person can share the table at dinner with each other person?

thanks alot,,, :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A general approach doesn't spring to mind but notice that if you arrange the people into pairs, each pair has five other pairs to sit with (i.e. one pair each day). Say you pair them (1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6), ... (11, 12).
\begin{array}{|c|c|c|}\hline \mbox{Day}&(1, 2)\ \mbox{sits with}&(3, 4)\ \mbox{sits with} \\ \hline 1&(3, 4)&(1, 2) \\ \hline 2&(5, 6)&(9, 10) \\ \hline 3&(7, 8)&(11, 12) \\ \hline 4&(9, 10)&(7, 8) \\ \hline 5&(11, 12)&(5, 6) \\ \hline \end{array}
You can just complete the table by hand. You may be after a better way to do this, but it does work ;)
 
That's quite a good way. ANother way to explain it is, after rewriting it as a problem with 6 people to meet on five days (thinking of a pair as a person) sit them down as pairs

1 2

3 4

5 6

then keeping 1 fixed rotate the other five pairs anticlockwise (or clockwise) once each of the 5 days.

This looks very much like a problem adapted from Bridge seeing as it can be done with pairs.
 
So I can't help but wonder how many solutions there are (for pairings). 6C2 = 15 unordered pairs. But how do you split those up into 5 sets of 3, all disjoint?

At the start of each round of choosing 3 pairs, each individual (i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) is in n of the p pairs. For the first round n = 5 and p = 15, and each round you subtract 1 from n and 3 from p. Figuring out how each round of choosing works is trickier; I see what's at work, but it's not clear how it's working. Every time you choose a pair, all pairs containing those individuals cannot be chosen that round, thus for every other individual, 2 pairs containing it are excluded. However, the choices are further restricted in a way I can't really explain. For instance, say {1, 4} is the first choice in round 3, leaving {2, 3}, {2, 6}, {3, 5}, {3, 6} -but I can only choose {2, 6} or {3, 5}.
Anyway, working it through, I get:
Round 1: 15C1 * 6C1 * 1C1 = 90
2: 12 * 4 * 1 = 48
3: 9 * 2 * 1 = 18
4: 6 * 2 * 1 = 12
5: 1
And I think I just sum the rounds: 169 solutions.? That seems like too many.
 
Last edited:
thanks alot, gentlemen!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top