Notation Question: Understanding "y --> 2^(-) implies y < -2

  • Thread starter Thread starter chemistry1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the notation "y --> 2^(-)" and its implication that y is less than -2. Participants clarify that this notation denotes left-hand limits, specifically indicating the limit of a function as it approaches a value from the left. There is consensus that the notation is incorrectly presented in the source material, as it should refer to "y --> -2^(-)" instead. The conversation confirms that both one-sided limits must be examined to determine if the limit exists. Overall, the group agrees on the need for accurate notation in mathematical expressions.
chemistry1
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question about : http://imgur.com/RU7PvtJ

I actually understand what I need to do. I need to see if both one sided limits are the same to establish that the limit exists. The only thing which I just find weird is the "since y --> 2^(-) implies y<-2"

Can somebody explain me where this y --> 2^(-) is coming from ??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is just a notation to denote the left-hand limits. So

\lim_{x\rightarrow a^-} f(x)

is the limit of ##f(x)## as ##x\rightarrow a## but ##x<a##.
 
But shouldn't we say : y --> -2^(-) and not y --> 2^(-) ?
 
chemistry1 said:
But shouldn't we say : y --> -2^(-) and not y --> 2^(-) ?

Yes, you are correct. The book is wrong there (and it is wrong is the same place on the next line too).
 
micromass said:
Yes, you are correct. The book is wrong there (and it is wrong is the same place on the next line too).
Yes, I also noticed it. Ok, thank you!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top