Physics Riddle: The Fate of the Balance

In summary: You have two buckets, one with water and one with glycerin, standing on opposite sides of a scale...The glycerin will weigh more than the water, so the scale will tilt down on the side of the glycerin bucket.
  • #1
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
22,183
3,321
What will happen to the balance:

abq50dE_460s_v4.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Richard Dean and Nathanael
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I assume the balls are equal volume?

I think the balance will tip to the right, only because the string on ping pong ball is pulling up on the container. If the ping pong ball were held in place (so it didn't float up) from the outside (like on the right side) then my answer would be that the scale will not move.

My reasoning is that the difference in weight (between the balls) is irrelevant because the excess weight of the steel ball is counteracted by the string holding it up. Both of the balls only push down on the water with the bouyant force proportional to their volume, so their mass is irrelevant.

But since there is a force of tension upwards on the left container, it must push down on the scale less, thus the scale tips to the right.
 
  • #3
Ain't saying. :tongue:

(Good one, micro! :approve:)
 
  • #4
micromass said:
What will happen

The steel ball will rust.
 
  • #5
I'll give it a try. I'm not certain of my answer though. Assuming we're supposed to say what will happen after insertion of the balls: The scale will tilt down on the side of the ping pong ball. (I haven't read the spoiler)
 
  • #6
The weight of both containers is the same. The depth of fluid in both containers is the same, so the hydrostatic pressure acting on both scale pans is the same. The only difference is the upwards force from the string on the left hand pan.
 
  • #7
I forgot to give the reason for my answer.

The balance scale measures a difference in mass. After insertion of the balls, the mass on the left plate has changed but the mass on the right plate has not changed (the steel ball is supported by the external hanger). Buoyancy is irrelevant because it's the same for both.
 
  • #8
At first I thought the scale tips to the left, but now I think it tips to the right. Assume the containers have the same mass so forget about them. Also assume the balls have the same volume. The plate on the left feels the weight of the ping pong ball plus the water. The plate on the right feels the weight of the water plus the buoyant force from the steel ball (the rest of the force is taken care of by the string so that it stays put in the water). The buoyant force from the steel ball is the weight of a ball of the same volume as the steel ball, but made of water. So since a ball made of water is heavier than the ping pong ball, the force on the right plate is greater, and the scale tips to the right.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #9
Way to go Zeta!

There apparently are a lot of people here who think they can pick themselves up by their bootstraps.
 
  • #10
D H said:
Way to go Zeta!

There apparently are a lot of people here who think they can pick themselves up by their bootstraps.


LOL ... I would have been another

instead I second the vote for V50's reply haha :wink:

Dave
 
  • #11
Good job, Zeta!
 
  • #12
It might have been interesting to also include a cup filled with water and no ball in it, then ask to compare the weights of all 3 cups, but that might have given away the answer. It could also be noted that the cup with the ping pong ball has lower average density, and no external forces (other than gravity) are exerted onto the ping pong ball.
 
  • #13
It boils down to this question: Does the upward force caused by the air inside the ping pong ball counterbalance the added weight of the ping pong ball itself and the string which holds it. Both balls displace the same amount of water (presumably) and the ball on the right adds no weight to the right side. I suspect the scale stays even, because the air lifts the ball and string - BUT the string is attached to the bottom of the glass, so I don't think it can lift the glass by its own bootstrap (string).
 
  • #14
Guess I don't understand how the steel ball contributes the weight of its volume in water to the weight on the right...
 
  • #15
BobKat said:
It boils down to this question: Does the upward force caused by the air inside the ping pong ball counterbalance the added weight of the ping pong ball itself and the string which holds it. Both balls displace the same amount of water (presumably) and the ball on the right adds no weight to the right side. I suspect the scale stays even, because the air lifts the ball and string - BUT the string is attached to the bottom of the glass, so I don't think it can lift the glass by its own bootstrap (string).

I just did the experiment. Zeta is correct. Although, I replaced the two balls with a plastic tool pick container, and the string with a rubber band. 9 oz vs 12 oz.

Buoyancy problems always have me scratching my head, and mopping up in the kitchen afterwards. :tongue:
 
  • #16
BobKat said:
Guess I don't understand how the steel ball contributes the weight of its volume in water to the weight on the right...

Replace the steel ball on the right, with a ping pong ball. Instead of a string, smoosh the ping pong ball down with your fingers. I actually did this, but my ping pong ball had too little volume to indicate a weight change on my cheesy little 16 ounce dollar store diet scale. Hence my toothpick container upgrade.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
BobKat said:
Guess I don't understand how the steel ball contributes the weight of its volume in water to the weight on the right...

Gravity exerts a downwards force onto the steel ball equal to the steel balls weight, which in turn exerts some of it's weight onto the water, and some onto the wire connected to the steel ball. This force is opposed by an upwards buoyant force exerted by what would the the weight of the water displaced by the steel ball. The remaining component of downwards force is opposed by the external (to the cup) upwards force from the wire connected to the steel ball. So the net downwards force exerted by the steel ball onto the water is equal in magnitude to the upwards buoyant force (Newton third law pair of forces), which is equal to what would be the weight of water displaced by the steel ball.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
you can think of it like a variation of energy problem, too.
If the right side moves down by ##\delta y## (i.e. positive ##\delta y## means right side goes down), then the change in GPE on the right is equal to ##- (V_{water} + V_{ball}) \rho_{water} g \delta y## This is because all the water moves down by ##\delta y## plus some small amount to account for the fact that the steel ball has moved upwards relative to it. The GPE of the steel ball itself does not change. Also, the left side will move upwards, so the change in GPE on the left side is: ##V_{water} \rho_{water} g \delta y + \rho_{pingpong} V_{ball} g \delta y## This is simply because everything on the left side moves upwards by ##\delta y## (including the ping pong ball). So, the total change in GPE is ##(\rho_{pingpong}-\rho_{water}) V_{ball} g \delta y## Which is negative, since the density of the ping pong ball is less than that of water, so in conclusion, if the right side moves down and left moves up, the total GPE will decrease, so that is what will happen.
 
  • #19
For those still struggling:
If the string pulling up on the steel ball supported the full weight of the ball, then both sides would be balanced. But it doesn't. (The buoyant force partially supports the ball.) Thus the right side is heavier.
 
  • #20
I think it is easiest to think of it in terms of external forces on the containers, since their weights are the same. The pressure of the water depends only the the height of the water level, which is the same for both of them, but the left container has an additional string pulling it up.
I think we have to be careful not to say that the steel ball's weight somehow channels through the water, because the water pressure is the same in both containers.
 
  • #21
chingel said:
I think it is easiest to think of it in terms of external forces on the containers, since their weights are the same. The pressure of the water depends only the the height of the water level, which is the same for both of them, but the left container has an additional string pulling it up.
I think we have to be careful not to say that the steel ball's weight somehow channels through the water, because the water pressure is the same in both containers.
"easiest to think of it..."? I did not understand one word of what you said. And their weights (including the balls in them) are not the same.
 
  • #22
Gerinski said:
"easiest to think of it..."? I did not understand one word of what you said. And their weights (including the balls in them) are not the same.

View the container itself as a system, viewing everything inside and outside of it as external. The containers themselves are the same, they weigh the same. Water pressure on both of the containers is exactly the same everywhere, but the left container has an extra string attached to it pulling it up, therefore it will go up.
 
  • #23
that is a nice way to think about it. Maybe not very intuitive though.

edit: It is probably the most inventive, of the ones I've seen so far :)
 
  • #24
I still don't get it:
Why does the steel ball have buoyancy and the ping pong one doesn't? is it because the steel one is more massive than the other?

(BTW I though than the balance would lean to the left due to the extra weight of the ping pong ball)
 
  • #25
derek10 said:
I still don't get it:
Why does the steel ball have buoyancy and the ping pong one doesn't? is it because the steel one is more massive than the other?

(BTW I though than the balance would lean to the left due to the extra weight of the ping pong ball)
The buoyant force on each ball is the same. Buoyant force depends only on the volume of fluid displaced, not the mass of the ball itself.

Extra weight of the ping pong ball? :confused:
 
  • #26
Doc Al said:
The buoyant force on each ball is the same. Buoyant force depends only on the volume of fluid displaced, not the mass of the ball itself.

Extra weight of the ping pong ball? :confused:

Yeah because if I interpreted the OP diagram properly it is tied into the container right? so it has a extra weight exerted into the container even if it's floating while the steel one is hanged so it doesn't weight anymore (only displaces water?)

What I don't understand is why does the steel ball exert a weight equivalent to a water ball of the same size but the ping pong doesn't (per Zeta's explanation, if I understood it well)
 
Last edited:
  • #27
chingel said:
Water pressure on both of the containers is exactly the same everywhere, but the left container has an extra string attached to it pulling it up, therefore it will go up.
That was my first idea too. And it seems like the simplest argument so far to me.
 
  • #28
Here is a similar one:

You have two identical steel balls hanging on opposite sides of a scale like this:

waage_f1c.jpg


You have two buckets, one with water and one with glycerin, standing on opposite sides of a scale like this:

scale.gif


Both scales are initially balanced. Then you fully submerge the balls into the buckets without touching the walls.

Does the balance of the scales change? If yes, how?
 
  • #29
A.T. said:
Here is a similar one:

No it won't change, both sides of the scale have the same mass/weight

Thats the first thing I thought so I'm pretty sure I'm wrong :tongue:
 
  • #30
chingel said:
View the container itself as a system, viewing everything inside and outside of it as external. The containers themselves are the same, they weigh the same. Water pressure on both of the containers is exactly the same everywhere, but the left container has an extra string attached to it pulling it up, therefore it will go up.
I don't thing that's correct, the string in the left container is not pulling it up, as someone said "nobody can lift himself by pulling his bootstraps".

I see the buoyancy argument but as Derek I do not see why only the right side should have the weight of the steel ball's buoyancy and not the left side the same buoyancy by the volume of water displaced by the ping-pong ball.
 
  • #31
Gerinski said:
I see the buoyancy argument but as Derek I do not see why only the right side should have the weight of the steel ball's buoyancy and not the left side the same buoyancy by the volume of water displaced by the ping-pong ball.
As both balls have the same volume and are completely submerged, they both have the same upward buoyant force.
 
  • #32
derek10 said:
No it won't change, both sides of the scale have the same mass/weight

Thats the first thing I thought so I'm pretty sure I'm wrong :tongue:
The balls are held in some fully submerged position, not just dropped and resting on the bottom. So other forces are involved.
 
  • #33
Doc Al said:
The balls are held in some fully submerged position, not just dropped and resting on the bottom. So other forces are involved.

Ok thanks I haven't read the "without touching the walls" part properly so I suppose they are hung too :)

Then I think the glycerin one will weight more as glycerin is denser than water

Probably wrong too, but I often think too quickly in these cases.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Gerinski said:
I don't thing that's correct, the string in the left container is not pulling it up, as someone said "nobody can lift himself by pulling his bootstraps".

I see the buoyancy argument but as Derek I do not see why only the right side should have the weight of the steel ball's buoyancy and not the left side the same buoyancy by the volume of water displaced by the ping-pong ball.

If we cut the string on the left container and let the ball float, the whole container doesn't get any heavier and so you can say in that sense that it can't pull itself up with the string. However, this is not the situation the original problem compares it with, because the other container has the same water level, but no string attached to the container.

Consider only the container, it has water pressure pushing it down and a string pulling it up, it doesn't care where is the water pressure or the string coming from, or what is pulling the string.

Regarding the other one with glycerin, using the same analysis, only the liquid pressure is acting on the containers, the change of height of the liquid level is the same for both of them, so with the denser liquid the pressure on the bottom will increase more, making it go down.
 
  • #35
Doc Al said:
As both balls have the same volume and are completely submerged, they both have the same upward buoyant force.
That's weird to hear from you as one of your previous posts says:

"If the string pulling up on the steel ball supported the full weight of the ball, then both sides would be balanced. But it doesn't. (The buoyant force partially supports the ball.) Thus the right side is heavier."
 
<h2>1. What is the "Physics Riddle: The Fate of the Balance"?</h2><p>The "Physics Riddle: The Fate of the Balance" is a thought experiment that challenges the concept of balance and equilibrium in physics. It involves a scenario where two objects of different masses are placed on opposite ends of a seesaw and asks what would happen if one object suddenly disappeared.</p><h2>2. How does this riddle relate to physics?</h2><p>This riddle relates to physics because it explores the principles of balance, equilibrium, and the laws of motion. It also requires critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which are essential in the field of physics.</p><h2>3. Can you provide a possible solution to the riddle?</h2><p>One possible solution to the riddle is that the seesaw would remain in its original position if the objects have equal masses. However, if the objects have different masses, the seesaw would tilt towards the heavier object due to the force of gravity.</p><h2>4. Are there any real-life applications of this riddle?</h2><p>While this riddle may seem like a simple thought experiment, it has real-life applications in various fields such as engineering, architecture, and even sports. It highlights the importance of balance and stability in designing structures and equipment.</p><h2>5. What can we learn from this riddle as a physicist?</h2><p>As a physicist, this riddle teaches us to think critically and creatively when faced with complex problems. It also reinforces the fundamental principles of physics, such as the laws of motion and the concept of equilibrium. Additionally, it shows the importance of considering all factors and variables in a system when making predictions or solving problems.</p>

1. What is the "Physics Riddle: The Fate of the Balance"?

The "Physics Riddle: The Fate of the Balance" is a thought experiment that challenges the concept of balance and equilibrium in physics. It involves a scenario where two objects of different masses are placed on opposite ends of a seesaw and asks what would happen if one object suddenly disappeared.

2. How does this riddle relate to physics?

This riddle relates to physics because it explores the principles of balance, equilibrium, and the laws of motion. It also requires critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which are essential in the field of physics.

3. Can you provide a possible solution to the riddle?

One possible solution to the riddle is that the seesaw would remain in its original position if the objects have equal masses. However, if the objects have different masses, the seesaw would tilt towards the heavier object due to the force of gravity.

4. Are there any real-life applications of this riddle?

While this riddle may seem like a simple thought experiment, it has real-life applications in various fields such as engineering, architecture, and even sports. It highlights the importance of balance and stability in designing structures and equipment.

5. What can we learn from this riddle as a physicist?

As a physicist, this riddle teaches us to think critically and creatively when faced with complex problems. It also reinforces the fundamental principles of physics, such as the laws of motion and the concept of equilibrium. Additionally, it shows the importance of considering all factors and variables in a system when making predictions or solving problems.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
902
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
908
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
18
Views
567
Back
Top