Understanding Einstein's field equations

ChromeBit
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm interested in trying to understand Einstein's field equations, I'm a physics student due to start an astrophysics course next year. I was just wondering if someone could give me some advice where to start?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
atyy said:
It's definitely nice, but I wouldn't call it introduction.

A really introductory book, for people more interested in astrophysics than in mathematical formalism, is
M. Berry, Principles of Cosmology and Gravitation
That book is definitely a good start, but certainly not a good end.

For those (future astrophysicists) who do not want to waste time with easy introductions and want to jump immediately to serious stuff, I would recommend
S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology

The problem with Weinberg's book is that it is quite long, so it is not an introduction either. For those who want a SHORT (but still serious) introduction to general relativity I recommend
P.A.M. Dirac, General Theory of Relativity (77 pages long !)

But neither of those is my favored book on general relativity. In my opinion, the best lectures/book is the one by Carroll, either the free shorter version:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9712019
or the longer one:
S. Caroll, Spacetime and Geometry
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
I agree with the particulars supplied to students of general relativity.
But in my opinion, the most recommended is the excellent General Relativity, B.Schutz. The reason is the following: exposes all the RG using a modern mathematical approach, which makes everything simpler. Many authors follow Schutz.
 
victorneto said:
I agree with the particulars supplied to students of general relativity.
But in my opinion, the most recommended is the excellent General Relativity, B.Schutz. The reason is the following: exposes all the RG using a modern mathematical approach, which makes everything simpler. Many authors follow Schutz.

Indeed, not only by modern mathematical approach, simple and intuitive, but also by good teaching used, the work of B.Schutz is suitable not only for beginners but for veterans in general relativity as well as teachers of matter. It is a work, in my opinion, simply wonderful.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top