Medical What is the truth about human brain power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Therian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the myth that humans only use 10% of their brains at any given time. Participants clarify that there is no scientific evidence supporting a specific percentage of brain usage, as it varies based on activities. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding brain function, including the role of glial cells, which outnumber neurons and are crucial for brain health and function. Recent research challenges the traditional view of glial cells as mere support, indicating they actively participate in neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity. The origins of the 10% myth are explored, with references to various studies and articles that debunk it, emphasizing the need for accurate information and reputable sources in discussions about brain science.
Therian
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
My friend was saying that

*it is only physically possiable for the average human to use 10% of their brain at once. (She wasn't saying we always use the same 10% of our brain though)

Is that true?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
heh, did you ask why that is? :)
 
Therian said:
My friend was saying that

*it is only physically possiable for the average human to use 10% of their brain at once. (She wasn't saying we always use the same 10% of our brain though)

Is that true?

This is a little different from the usual 10% myth. I don't know of any research that says what percentage of the brain is in use at any moment; it would vary of course depending on what you were doing. And what counts as "brain"? Do we count all the glial cells (support tissue, non active) in the denominator? Ask her for a reference. If she says "It's generally known" be sure she's just retailing a myth.
 
Hi,

Do we count all the glial cells (support tissue, non active)
This knowledge is unfortunately out to date. :smile:
 
What are brains? I am sorry, my kidney isn't that smart.

-- AI
 
somasimple said:
selfAdjoint said:
Do we count all the glial cells (support tissue, non active)
This knowledge is unfortunately out to date. :smile:

somasimple, thanks for keeping us on our toes, but it would be nice if you could go into more details when discussing factual matters like this one. Even just posting a link to a reputable source on the matter should be sufficient.

According to the Wikipedia entry on glial cells:

Glial cells, commonly called neuroglia or simply glia, are non-neuronal cells that provide support and nutrition, maintain homeostasis, form myelin, and participate in signal transmission in the nervous system. In the human brain, glia are estimated to outnumber neurons by as much as 50 to 1.

Traditionally glia are thought to lack certain features of neurons. For example, glia are not believed to have chemical synapses, nor do they generate action potentials or release neurotransmitters. They were considered to be the passive bystanders of neural transmission. However, recent studies completely reversed these dogma. For example, astrocytes are crucial in clearance of neurotransmitter within the synaptic cleft, which temporally and spatially restricts neurotransmission and limit the toxicity of certain neurotransmitters such as glutamate. And at least in vitro astrocytes can release neurotransmitter glutamate in response to certain stimulation. Another unique type of glia, the oligodendrocyte precursor cells or OPCs, have very well defined and functional synapses from at least two major groups of neurons. The only notable differences between neurons and glia, by modern scrutiny, are the ability to generate action potentials and the polarity of neurons, namely the axons and dendrites which glia lack. It is inappropriate nowadays to consider glia as 'glue' in the nervous system as the name implies. They are also crucial in the development of nervous system and in processes such as synaptic plasticity and synaptogenesis.
 
Phobos said:

According to this article, "The origins of the myth are not at all clear." Here's an article that goes a little deeper into the origins of the 10% myth (you may have to scroll down a bit to get to the article):

Exploding the 10 percent myth
So where did this particular old wives' tale spring from? Well, there are at least three famous bits of neuroscientific research that have fed the myth. And here are the modern countering arguments.
 
Back
Top