How Accurate is the Fish Population Estimate in the Lake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexsandro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Estimate
AI Thread Summary
The researchers are estimating the fish population in a lake by initially tagging 100 fish and later recapturing 100 fish, of which 7 are tagged. Using the capture-recapture method, they estimate the total fish population to be approximately 1,428 based on the proportion of tagged fish. This estimate relies on the assumption that the tagged fish mix evenly with the untagged population and that the capture process is random. Additionally, it assumes that no significant changes in the population occurred between the tagging and recapture phases. Accurate population estimates depend on these assumptions being met.
Alexsandro
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Researchers of a department of engineering of fish are studying the fish of a lake. In the first phase of the work they collect 100 fish, place labels in all they and they return them to the lake. One week later them they come back to the lake, they collect more 100 fish and they observe that 7 of them possesses labels.

(a) Which the best estimate for the number of fish in the lake?

(b) That assumptions must be satisfied to justify the estimate of the previous item ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(a) N=100(100/7)=1428

(b) Extrapolation - since 7/100 of the caught fish were tagged, assume that 7/100 times (N) total number of fish = total number of that have been tagged (=100).
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top