Using SageMD for molecular dynamics

cbaykam
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi ;
Is there anybody using SageMD for molecular experiments. I am planning to set up a mail group for SageMD or all the molecular dynamics simulator software. Please write me if you want to join or if you know any other place for me to find anyone please tell me... Thank you all...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cbaykam said:
Hi ;
Is there anybody using SageMD for molecular experiments. I am planning to set up a mail group for SageMD or all the molecular dynamics simulator software. Please write me if you want to join or if you know any other place for me to find anyone please tell me... Thank you all...

Just want to let you know if you are really sure that molecular dynamics (MD) are really necessary for your goals. I mean, this software requires tremendous amount of computational effort and time. Do you have the necessary resources (parallel supercomputers and all). Keep in mind that in most of the case MD is not even necessary because you can bypass it by being smart.

Let me give you this example : suppose you want to know the temperature dependence of a semiconductor/metal interface. The best way to model that is MD. But there is a way out : suppose the interface is studied at 900 degrees C and 400 degrees C. Then measure (with AFM for example or TEM) the crystalline structure of the SC and the metal. At each temperature value, this structure will be different. Then, you use this crystalline structure as the imput for the simulations. This will go much much faster and you will find out how the interface electrostatics will change with temperature. At least you will have a qualititive insight in what is going on.

You see ?

marlon
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top