Solving Water Level Puzzle: Page 6 of 1902 Exam Solutions 2004

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Please refer to page 6 of

http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/ugrad/jphys/jphys_webct/jp_exams/1902_exam_2004.pdf

I'm quoting from the solution guide:

http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/ugrad/jphys/jphys_webct/jp_exams/1902_exam_solutions_2004.pdf

P_1 = P_A + \rho g y_1 and P_2 = P_A + \rho g y_2

Hence

\Delta h = y_1 - y_2.

Is it just me or does this last step total nonsense? AIUI, y_1 and y_2 refer to the position of the water levels measured with respect to two different coordinate systems. So how is it justified to say \Delta h = y_1 - y_2? I drew a diagram and calculated the vertical separation between the water levels to be y_1 - y_2 + \frac{D_2 - D_1}{2}. Could someone please point out if I am missing something obvious.

Thanks.

James
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're only asked to calculate the height differences on the columns. That's pretty much just a fluid statics problem. The pressures are all you care about. When you ask how is it justified to say y_1 = y_2 just take a look at the fluid static FBD:

At column number 1, you have atmospheric pressure in equillibrium with the fluid static pressure at point one, or P_1 = P_a + \rho g y_1. At point 2, you have atmospheric pressure in equillibrium with the fluid's static pressure at point 2 or P_2 = P_a + \rho g y_2.

Since it is assumed incompressible and no local changes in g, then that means that the only thing that can change as P_1 amd P_2 change is y.

I guess the best thing would be for you to post how you came up with your answer and we can go from there.
 
Last edited:
The diagram is mislabeled. The delta h in the diagram is y_1 - y_2 + \frac{D_2 - D_1}{2}. The question makes sense as long as you "assume" that they actually want y_1 - y_2. Quite a silly question.
 
jdstokes said:
The diagram is mislabeled. The delta h in the diagram is y_1 - y_2 + \frac{D_2 - D_1}{2}. The question makes sense as long as you "assume" that they actually want y_1 - y_2. Quite a silly question.

You've lost me on that one. The \Delta h is the pressure drop across the venturi. \Delta h has to equal y_1 - y_2. How can they be different values? All that is done is to take the relationship derived for P_1 - P_2 = \frac{1}{2}\rho \Delta V^2 and replace the velocity terms with V = \frac{R}{A}

Show how you arrived at your conclusion. That would help.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.

Similar threads

Back
Top