Solving Water Level Puzzle: Page 6 of 1902 Exam Solutions 2004

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a fluid statics problem related to water levels in columns, as referenced from an exam solution guide. Participants are examining the relationship between pressure and height differences in the context of the given problem.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the justification for the equation Δh = y1 - y2, particularly regarding the coordinate systems used for y1 and y2. There are discussions about the assumptions made in the problem, including the treatment of fluid pressure and the labeling of diagrams.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions behind the problem setup, with some participants suggesting that the diagram may be mislabeled. Others are attempting to clarify the relationship between pressure and height differences, while also inviting further elaboration on the original poster's calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the problem may hinge on assumptions about fluid incompressibility and the nature of the pressure differences involved. There is also mention of specific details in the diagram that may affect the interpretation of the problem.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Please refer to page 6 of

http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/ugrad/jphys/jphys_webct/jp_exams/1902_exam_2004.pdf

I'm quoting from the solution guide:

http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/ugrad/jphys/jphys_webct/jp_exams/1902_exam_solutions_2004.pdf

[itex]P_1 = P_A + \rho g y_1[/itex] and [itex]P_2 = P_A + \rho g y_2[/itex]

Hence

[itex]\Delta h = y_1 - y_2[/itex].

Is it just me or does this last step total nonsense? AIUI, [itex]y_1[/itex] and [itex]y_2[/itex] refer to the position of the water levels measured with respect to two different coordinate systems. So how is it justified to say [itex]\Delta h = y_1 - y_2[/itex]? I drew a diagram and calculated the vertical separation between the water levels to be [itex]y_1 - y_2 + \frac{D_2 - D_1}{2}[/itex]. Could someone please point out if I am missing something obvious.

Thanks.

James
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're only asked to calculate the height differences on the columns. That's pretty much just a fluid statics problem. The pressures are all you care about. When you ask how is it justified to say [tex]y_1 = y_2[/tex] just take a look at the fluid static FBD:

At column number 1, you have atmospheric pressure in equillibrium with the fluid static pressure at point one, or [tex]P_1 = P_a + \rho g y_1[/tex]. At point 2, you have atmospheric pressure in equillibrium with the fluid's static pressure at point 2 or [tex]P_2 = P_a + \rho g y_2[/tex].

Since it is assumed incompressible and no local changes in g, then that means that the only thing that can change as [tex]P_1[/tex] amd [tex]P_2[/tex] change is [tex]y[/tex].

I guess the best thing would be for you to post how you came up with your answer and we can go from there.
 
Last edited:
The diagram is mislabeled. The delta h in the diagram is [itex]y_1 - y_2 + \frac{D_2 - D_1}{2}[/itex]. The question makes sense as long as you "assume" that they actually want [itex]y_1 - y_2[/itex]. Quite a silly question.
 
jdstokes said:
The diagram is mislabeled. The delta h in the diagram is [itex]y_1 - y_2 + \frac{D_2 - D_1}{2}[/itex]. The question makes sense as long as you "assume" that they actually want [itex]y_1 - y_2[/itex]. Quite a silly question.

You've lost me on that one. The [tex]\Delta h[/tex] is the pressure drop across the venturi. [tex]\Delta h[/tex] has to equal [tex]y_1 - y_2[/tex]. How can they be different values? All that is done is to take the relationship derived for [tex]P_1 - P_2 = \frac{1}{2}\rho \Delta V^2[/tex] and replace the velocity terms with [tex]V = \frac{R}{A}[/tex]

Show how you arrived at your conclusion. That would help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K