Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the process of patenting a new bottle design for ketchup and the potential for selling that design to a major company like Heinz. Participants explore various aspects of patenting, including costs, legal considerations, and strategies for approaching companies.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- One participant suggests writing up a plan and getting it notarized to establish a date for the idea before approaching Heinz, implying that this could provide legal leverage.
- Another participant warns about the high costs of hiring a patent attorney and suggests that a competent patent agent could suffice, emphasizing the importance of not disclosing the idea publicly.
- Concerns are raised about the potential for litigation if Heinz finds a loophole in a patent application, with one participant estimating litigation costs could exceed initial patenting costs.
- Some participants joke about alternative ideas related to ketchup, including humorous and absurd concepts like growing tomatoes in a bottle or ketchup paintballs, which detracts from the main topic.
- There are discussions about the ethics and implications of high-interest loans in the context of one participant's job, which leads to a side conversation unrelated to the patenting topic.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of opinions on the patenting process, with no clear consensus on the best approach. Some emphasize the importance of legal protection and professional assistance, while others question the feasibility of getting a major company like Heinz to adopt a new design.
Contextual Notes
Participants mention various criteria for patent eligibility, including novelty, usefulness, and non-obviousness, but there is no detailed exploration of these criteria. The discussion also includes humorous and tangential remarks that may distract from the main topic.
Who May Find This Useful
Individuals interested in intellectual property, patent law, or those considering submitting product ideas to large companies may find this discussion relevant.