Conservation of linear momentum at relativistic speeds

carl fischbach
The question I ask is linear momentum conserved in
in instance cited below?


You place a particle at the origin on a x-y axis
and accelerate it to 61% of c in the y direction.
Then you accelerate it to 61% of c in the x direction.
The net velocity of the particle will be
86% of c at 45 degrees.The key here is that it
takes approximately 3 times the energy to
accelerate the particle in the x direction than
the y direction, due to the fact that the net
velocity change in the y direction is 0%-61% of c
and in x direction the net velocity change is
61%-86% of c.If the rate of acceleration,distance
of acceleration and time of acceleration are the
same on the x and y axis, then force of acceleration on
the x-axis has to be greater than
on the y axis, since the energy of acceleration
on the x-axis is 3 times that of the y axis.
Therefore the momentum on the x-axis is greater
the y axis.

If the particle's final velocity is 86% of c at
45 degrees then the momentum of acceleration
should be equal on both the x and y axis.
Is there a discrepancy in momentum here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by carl fischbach
The question I ask is linear momentum conserved in
in instance cited below?


You place a particle at the origin on a x-y axis
and accelerate it to 61% of c in the y direction.
Then you accelerate it to 61% of c in the x direction.
The net velocity of the particle will be
86% of c at 45 degrees.The key here is that it
takes approximately 3 times the energy to
accelerate the particle in the x direction than
the y direction, due to the fact that the net
velocity change in the y direction is 0%-61% of c
and in x direction the net velocity change is
61%-86% of c.If the rate of acceleration,distance
of acceleration and time of acceleration are the
same on the x and y axis, then force of acceleration on
the x-axis has to be greater than
on the y axis, since the energy of acceleration
on the x-axis is 3 times that of the y axis.
Therefore the momentum on the x-axis is greater
the y axis.

If the particle's final velocity is 86% of c at
45 degrees then the momentum of acceleration
should be equal on both the x and y axis.
Is there a discrepancy in momentum here?
I don't think so. No acceleration above 0.61c is used or provides momentum. The 0.86c is the apparent VECTORED V (in your example). But, I don't think that your example is correct since you seem to be using two-dimensional (graph-paper) trig here, while with excluding time. In V calculations, a Y velocity at 0.61c and an X velocity at 0.61c takes time to reach the "end-point" from where you measure the Hypotenuse. The "actual V" of the vectored triangle cannot exceed the V of the greater of the XV or the YV if time is included. The "apparent" V can though, as is seen in apparent superluminal expansion around some supernova remnants.
 
Last edited:


Yes, there is a discrepancy in momentum in this scenario. While linear momentum is conserved in all frames of reference, the conservation of momentum at relativistic speeds is not as straightforward as it is in classical mechanics. This is due to the fact that as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases and its momentum also increases. In this scenario, the particle's final velocity is 86% of c, which means its mass has increased and therefore its momentum has also increased. However, the discrepancy in momentum arises from the fact that it takes 3 times the energy to accelerate the particle in the x direction compared to the y direction. This means that the force of acceleration on the x-axis is greater, resulting in a greater momentum in that direction. Therefore, while the total momentum of the particle is conserved, the distribution of momentum between the x and y directions is not equal.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top