Electron spin and chemical bonding

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between electron spin and chemical bonding, particularly focusing on whether paired electrons with opposite spins are necessary for bond formation between atoms like sodium and chlorine. Participants explore concepts related to ionic and covalent bonding, the Pauli exclusion principle, and the implications of electron spin states on chemical reactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that paired electrons in an atomic shell must have opposite spins, questioning if this affects the formation of bonds between Na+ and Cl-.
  • One participant clarifies that the bond between sodium and chlorine is ionic, resulting from electrostatic attraction rather than covalent bonding, which involves the Pauli exclusion principle.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that the total spin of reactants must equal that of the products for a reaction to occur, referencing radical pair generation and the need for spin state conversion.
  • A participant speculates that hydrogen atoms may rotate to align their electron spins before bonding, comparing this to macroscopic magnets aligning their fields, and suggests that this process might involve a small energy factor.
  • One participant provides a reference to the Woodward-Hoffmann rules, indicating a potential resource for further exploration of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of opposite spins for bond formation, with some focusing on ionic versus covalent bonding and others exploring the implications of spin states in reactions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific effects of electron spin on bonding dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions about electron behavior and bonding without reaching a consensus on the implications of spin states in chemical reactions. The complexity of the interactions and the definitions of bonding types contribute to the ongoing debate.

chroot
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
10,266
Reaction score
45
I am relaying this question from rtharbaugh1, who originally posted it to a thread in the Quantum Physics forum:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=98040

Originally posted by rtharbaugh1
I first read that paired electrons in an atomic shell must have opposite spin. Does this mean that a chemical bond will not form between, say, Na+ and Cl-, unless the two atoms have electrons of opposite spin? Wouldn't this mean that two such atoms brought sufficiently close together would only form a bond half the time? Can we manipulate single atoms of sodium and chlorine to test this idea? Has it been done?

Can any of you chemistry nerds answer this? :smile:

- Warren
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
There is no chemical bond between chlorine and sodium. That is to say it is only electrostatic attraction, an ionic bond as opposed to a covalent bond. The pauli exclusion principle applies to electrons that occupy the same orbital, such as in a covalent bond.

If you bring an atom of sodium near a atom of chlorine, the sodium will give its electron to chlorine, resulting in the sodium cation and the chloride ion, which bind ionically.

But that skirts the question. If you bring a hydrogen atom, a radical, together with another hydrogen atom, will they only react half the time? Is this a better question? What do you think will happen?
 
The typical train of thought (as I understood it) is that the total spin of the reactants must be equal to the products in order for a reaction to occur. The well worn example is that of recombination after radical pair generation by photolysis/radiolysis - there needs to be a conversion from the triplet state into the singlet state for the diamagnetic starting product to be formed.
 
spin states and bonding

Originally posted by Chemicalsuperfreak

If you bring a hydrogen atom, a radical, together with another hydrogen atom, will they only react half the time? Is this a better question? What do you think will happen?

Thanks for not leaving me with a skirted question. I appreciate the correction, and agree that the H-H covalent bond is a better example of the process I am curious about.

As for what I think will happen, I suspect that the hydrogen atoms will rotate in 3space until the electron spins match up to give the lowest energy state. Then they will bond together in that spatial relationship. I imagine this process as being similar to a pair of macroscopic magnets sufficiently close together re-aligning to match their magnetic fields. In fact, I would speculate that magnetism in general may have much to do with spin states.

There may be some small factor of energy taken to effect the rotation, and that may cause some small delay in the bonding of some atoms with certain others, but given the very small mass of an atom, I doubt if the rotation delay could be measured.

Thanks for the answer. I will watch for your reply about the magnetizm thing.

Richard
 
Search "Woodward-Hoffman rules;" there are a couple decent sites on the first page of the list, 224 hits = 127 actual sites.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K