Transformation Definition and 1000 Threads
-
D
I Canonical transformation from canonical to kinetic momentum
My classical mechanics is very rusty. Recently, I wondered if it is possible to replace the canonical momentum with the kinetic momentum using a canonical transformation (so this isn't homework). I tried to work this out, but somehow, the Lorenz force got lost. Maybe some of you has an idea what...- DrDu
- Thread
- Momentum Transformation
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Classical Physics
-
F
I Matrix form of metric component transformation?
The transformation of the metric from unprimed to primed coordinates is given in Moore's GR workbook as: ##g'_{uv} = \frac{\partial x^a}{\partial x^{'u}} \frac{\partial x^b}{\partial x^{'v}}g_{ab}## In matrix form, by matching indices on both sides (so that u and v are the outer 'indices'), I...- farfromdaijoubu
- Thread
- Coordinate Metric Transformation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
I Lorentz transformation on mode functions
Suppose we can boost from a frame ##S## to another frame ##S'## by using a Lorentz transformation ##\Lambda##. Also, ##\phi(x^\mu;\omega,\mathbf k)## is a mode function of a scalar field in frame ##S##. Then, how do we express this mode function in frame ##S'##? Here is my attempt. First, the...- Haorong Wu
- Thread
- Lorentz Mode Transformation
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
Find the Reflection Line of a Matrix, and Analyze the Transformation
I just want to make sure I'm doing this right. I know how to do the rotation, but reflection isn't demonstrated in the text. From what I'm seeing in the book, it seems like you take the matrix and simply multiply it by ##\begin{bmatrix} x \\ y \end{bmatrix} ## Assuming that's the case, I get...- Ascendant0
- Thread
- Matrix Reflection Transformation
- Replies: 10
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
A Schrodinger equation/Madelung equation phase transformation
When one does the phase transformation ##\psi(\vec{x},t)=R(\vec{x},t)\exp^{iS(\vec{x},t)/\bar{h}}## For this transformation to be valid doesn't it need to have the same asymptotic behaviour ##x \to \pm \infty##, and also at ##x=0 ## as the original wave-function ##\psi## does? How come this is...- binbagsss
- Thread
- Phase Transformation
- Replies: 32
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
M
How should I show that the transformation makes the system Hamiltonian?
Proof: Consider the transformation ## x=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+e^{-2q}}} ## and ## y=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+e^{-2p}}} ## with the Hamiltonian function ## H(q, p)=ap-b\cdot ln(e^{p}+\sqrt{1+e^{2p}})+cq-d\cdot ln(e^{q}+\sqrt{1+e^{2q}}) ##. Let ## \dot{x}=\frac{dx}{dt}=(a-by)x(1-x^2)=(a-by)(x-x^3) ## and ##...- Math100
- Thread
- Hamiltonian Proof Transformation
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
Lorentz Transformation For Moving Particles
So, I linked an image to Problem 1.26 below. As far as that problem, to save you the trouble, the answers (at least from what I have) are: a) ##\gamma = 1.7 ## b) ## t = 3x10^{-8} ## c) ## Pions = 30,555 ## d) ## Pions = 29,628 ## Fairly confident those are correct, but now this question...- Ascendant0
- Thread
- Lorentz Pions Transformation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
K
I A question about Curved Spaces: Gauss and Riemann (Einstein Gravity in a Nutshell by Zee)
In p. 84, Zee says “In the new coordinates, M is replaced by M’ = R[-1]MR.” However, I figure out M is replaced by M’ = RMR[-1]. Why is M replaced by M’ = R[-1]MR?- Keita
- Thread
- Coordinates Mass Transformation
- Replies: 11
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
P
I Noethers theorem, transformations of the Lagrange density
I'm so confused here. If we make the transformation of the coordinates x -> x', are we not suppose to consider the transformation of the coordinates only $$ \phi(x) \rightarrow \phi(x') $$ ? Then why are they writing $$ \phi(x) \rightarrow \phi'(x') $$ ? If $$ \phi(x) $$ is a scalar function...- PreposterousUniverse
- Thread
- Coordinates Fields Transformation
- Replies: 5
- Forum: Mechanics
-
I Gallilean v/s Lorentz transformation
.- PhysicsEnjoyer31415
- Thread
- Galilean Lorentz Transformation
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
I Understanding the given transformation - PDE
My interest is on how they arrived at ##r^2 \sin θ## My approach using the third line, is as follows ##\cos θ[r^2 \cos θ \sin θ \cos^2 ∅ + r^2 \sin θ \cos θ cos^2∅ ] + r\sin θ [r\sin^2 θ \cos^2∅ + r \sin^2 θ \sin^2 ∅]=## ##\cos θ[r^2 \cos θ \sin θ[\cos^2 ∅+ \sin^2 ∅]] + r\sin θ [r\sin^2 θ...- chwala
- Thread
- Approach Calculation Transformation
- Replies: 5
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
I
MCNPX Transformation
Hello, I doing my thesis, I'm beginner in MCNPX. I want to ask about transformation in MCNPX, I want to transform this head phantom in inside and outside field ( radiation using LINAC from face to ear) in angle 90° and 270 °. Can anyone help me to solve this problem with transformation code?- ifa23
- Thread
- Mcnpx Radiation Transformation
- Replies: 14
- Forum: Nuclear Engineering
-
M
B Origins of the no-cloning theorem
I was watching this video by minutephysics on the No-cloning theorem. Henry very plainly shows why the no-cloning theorem holds, given the setup. However, I am no quantum physicist and lack the necessary background to truly understand what's going on there. What are the origins of the 3...- martix
- Thread
- Composite Superposition Transformation
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
I Is there a way to calculate this transformation?
Namaste & G'day! Imagine a helicopter view of a Polo ground. It's length & breadth are known. Now you are seated where the blue dot is. Your view is such: How do mathematicians calculate the distance travelled by a ball from the second perspective? From the top view, this would be...- wirefree
- Thread
- distance Perspective Transformation
- Replies: 4
- Forum: General Math
-
H
A Vector field vs. four scalar fields ("QFT and the SM", Schwartz)
This is the statement in question: But if they were scalar fields, they would not transform at all. How could they contribute differently if they didn't change?- Hill
- Thread
- Field Quantum Transformation
- Replies: 10
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
C
What Happens to Blue Sphere Silica Gel at High Temperatures?
What type of chemical and physical transformation occurs in the blue sphere silica gel when it is subjected to very high temperatures above the temperature supported by it for several minutes? does it turn into a compound that will absorb and store moisture and water inside and can leak if it... -
L
I Help Understanding Equation 3.6 in Covariant Physics by Moataz H. Emam
I am a physics enthusiast reading Covariant Physics by Moataz H. Emam. In his chapter about Point Particle mechanics there is a transformation equation for a displacement vector. I don't see how he arrived at the final equation 3.6. Is it a chain rule or product rule? Can't seem to figure it...- louvig
- Thread
- Covariant Transformation
- Replies: 5
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
S
I Fuel paradox arising from Galilean transformation?
I have encountered a problem related to the Galilean Transformation. Let's consider two observers who will be referred to as ##O## and ##O^{'}##, with their corresponding coordinates ##(t,x,y,z)## and ##(t^{′},x^{′},y^{′},z^{'})## respectively. They are initially at the same location, at time...- SeniorGara
- Thread
- Galilean Observer Transformation
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Mechanics
-
A Infinitesimal Coordinate Transformation and Lie Derivative
I need to prove that under an infinitesimal coordinate transformation ##x^{'\mu}=x^\mu-\xi^\mu(x)##, the variation of a vector ##U^\mu(x)## is $$\delta U^\mu(x)=U^{'\mu}(x)-U^\mu(x)=\mathcal{L}_\xi U^\mu$$ where ##\mathcal{L}_\xi U^\mu## is the Lie derivative of ##U^\mu## wrt the vector...- Baela
- Thread
- Coordinate Coordinate transformation Derivative Diffeomorphism Differential geometry Infinitesimal Lie derivative Transformation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
Field transformations in the z-direction
Question: Eq. 12.109: My solution: We’ll first use the configuration from figure 12.35 in the book Griffiths. Where the only difference is that v_0 is in the z-direction. The electric field in the y-direction will be the same. $$E_y = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon _0}$$ Now we're going to derive the...- milkism
- Thread
- Field Fields Lorentz boost Transformation Transformations
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
O
Coordinate transformation into a standard flat metric
I started by expanding ##dx## and ##dt## using chain rule: $$dt = \frac{dt}{dX}dX+\frac{dt}{dT}dT$$ $$dx = \frac{dx}{dX}dX+\frac{dx}{dT}dT$$ and then expressing ##ds^2## as such: $$ds^2 =...- offscene
- Thread
- Coordinate Coordinate transformation Flat General relativity Metric Special relativity Standard Transformation
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
K
What is 4-Vector Potential Transformation under Gauge Fixing?
What is 4- vector potential transformation under Gauge fixing ?- Kulkarni Sourabh
- Thread
- Potential Transformation Vector Vector potential
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
G
I 4-Current vector potential transformation under Gauge fixing
I am given an initial vector potential let's say: \begin{equation} \vec{A} = \begin{pmatrix} g(t,x)\\ 0\\ 0\\ g(t,x)\\ \end{pmatrix} \end{equation} And I would like to know how it will transform under the Lorenz Gauge transformation. I know that the Lorenz Gauge satisfy...- George444fg
- Thread
- Electrodyanmics Gauge Gauge fixing Potential Transformation Vector Vector potential
- Replies: 5
- Forum: Electromagnetism
-
B Transformation Rules For A General Tensor M
So, I've been watching eigenchris's video series "Tensors for Beginners" on YouTube. I am currently on video 14. I am a complete beginner and just want some clarification on if I'm truly understanding the material. Basically, is everything below this correct? In summary of the derivation of the...- Vanilla Gorilla
- Thread
- General Linear algebra Rules Tensor Tensor notation Tensor product Transformation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
G
Apply the Legendre Transformation to the Entropy S as a function of E
Hi, Unfortunately I am not getting anywhere with task three, I don't know exactly what to show Shall I now show that from ##S(T,V,N)## using Legendre I then get ##S(E,V,N)## and thus obtain the Sackur-Tetrode equation?- GravityX
- Thread
- Apply Entropy Function Legendre Legendre transformation Transformation
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
L
Point transformation for a constrained particle
Hi, unfortunately, I'm not that fit concerning the Lagrangian formalism, so I'm not sure if I solved the problem 1a correctly. I have now proceeded as follows the Lagrangian is $$L=T-U$$ Since there are no constraining or other forces acting on the point mass, I assume that the...- Lambda96
- Thread
- Particle Point Transformation
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
J
Transformation Matrix T in Terms of β1, β2 with Row Reduction Explained
T(α1), T(α2), T(α3) written in terms of β1, β2: Tα1 =(1,−3) Tα2 =(2,1) Tα3 =(1,0). Then there is row reduction: Therefore, the matrix of T relative to the pair B, B' is I don't understand why the row reduction takes place? Also, how do these steps relate to ## B = S^{-1}AS ##? Thank you.- jolly_math
- Thread
- Matrix Transformation Transformation matrix
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
I Is this transformation irreversible?
This is a cyclic transformation. Is it safe to say thay it's irreversible because if you reverse it, it means I could extract an amount of heat from a cold reservoir and move it into a hotter reservoir with no other effect?- Ahmed1029
- Thread
- Irreversible Reversible processes Thermodaynamics Transformation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
Coordinate Transformation (multivariable calculus)
My Progress: I tried to perform the coordinate transformation by considering a general function ##f(\mathbf{k},\omega,\mathbf{R},T)## and see how its derivatives with respect all variable ##(\mathbf{k},\omega,\mathbf{R},T)## change: $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial\omega} f =...- luqman
- Thread
- Calculus Classical mechanics Coordinate Coordinate transformation Coordinate transformations Electromagnetic field Multivariable calculus Quanfum field theory Transformation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
J
Linear Transformation from R3 to R3
"There is a linear transformation T from R3 to R3 such that T (1, 0, 0) = (1,0,−1), T(0,1,0) = (1,0,−1) and T(0,0,1) = (1,2,2)" - why is this the case? Thank you.- jolly_math
- Thread
- Linear Linear algebra Linear transformation Linear transformations Transformation
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
G
I Coordinate System Transformation: Lowering/Raising Indices Explained
In《Introducing Einstein's Relativity Ed 2》on page 106"lowering the first index with the metric,then it is easy to establish,for example by using geodesic coordinates..." In 《A First Course in General Relativity - 2nd Edition》on page 159 "If we lower the index a,we get(in the locally flat...- GR191511
- Thread
- Coordinate Coordinate system Indices System Transformation
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
I Difference Between Lorentz Transformation & Special Relativity
Sorry for the extra question. Just have a lot of questions lately and I know some people around here are annoyed with that.- BadgerBadger92
- Thread
- Difference Lorentz Lorentz transformation Relativity Special relativity Transformation
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
S
Simple Fourier transformation calculation
So, ##\hat{p}(\omega)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} p(t)e^{-i\omega t}\mathrm{d}t=A\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-t(\gamma+i(\omega+\omega_0))}=A\left[-\frac{e^{-t(\gamma+i(\omega+\omega_0))}}{\gamma+i(\omega+\omega_0)}\right]_0^\infty,## provided ##\gamma+ i(\omega+\omega_0)\neq 0## for the last equality. Now...- schniefen
- Thread
- Calculation Fourier Fourier transform Transformation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
S
B Lorentz Transformation of Electric & Magnetic Fields Visualized
I made a tool for calculating and visualizing how the electric and magnetic fields transform under a Lorentz boost. Thought I'd share it here, in case anyone finds it interesting. https://em-transforms.vercel.app/- SiennaTheGr8
- Thread
- Electric Fields Lorentz Lorentz transformation Magnetic Magnetic fields Transformation
- Replies: 23
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
P
I Question about algebraic transformation
Hello, I would like to reproduce the following equation, but I don't quite understand how to do the transformation: $$ \sum_{i=1}^k \left( \frac{\langle y , x_i^* \rangle}{\sqrt{\langle x_i^*, x_i^* \rangle}} \right)^2 = \langle y, y \rangle$$ Where ##x_1^*,...,x_k^*##, are orthogonalized...- Peter_Newman
- Thread
- Transformation
- Replies: 25
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
I Coord Transform in de Sitter Space: Phys Significance &Linearity?
Could one derive a set of coordinate transformations that transforms events between different reference frames in the de Sitter metric using the invariant line element, similar to how the Lorentz Transformations leave the line element of the Minkowski metric invariant? Would these coordinate...- Sciencemaster
- Thread
- Coordinate Coordinate transformation Coordinate transformations General relativity Line element Lorentz transformations Space Transformation
- Replies: 5
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
A Non-unitary gauge transformation
You see in the literature that the vector potentials in a gauge covariant derivative transform like: A_\mu \rightarrow T A_\mu T^{-1} + i(\partial_\mu T) T^{-1} Where T is not necessarily unitary. (In the case that it is ##T^{-1} = T^\dagger##) My question is then if T is not unitary, how is...- DuckAmuck
- Thread
- Gauge Gauge transformation Transform Transformation
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Beyond the Standard Models
-
Fourier transformation for circular apertures
My notes say that the Resolution of the Aperture(in the Electric field of the wave) is the Fourier transformation of the aperture. Then gives us the equation of the aperture: and says that for the circular aperture in particular also: My attempt at solving this: We know that the Fourier...- QuarkDecay
- Thread
- Circular Fourier Resolution Telescopes Transformation
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
I Constraints on Lorentz Velocity Transformation
1. The 2nd line on the 3rd page of your notes, you have x=ct and x'=ct', thus ux=dx/dt and ux'= dx'/dt' =c according to Einstein's assumptiuon. 2. But near the end of the last page, you wrote dx'/dt' = (ux -v)/(1-vux/c2) . Compare with 1. This equation can be valid only for ux=c and...- alhuebel
- Thread
- Constraints Lorentz Transformation Velocity Velocity transformation
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
A
A What assumptions underly the Lorentz transformation?
The Lorentz transform for velocities is as follows: $$u=\frac{v+w}{1+\frac{vw}{c^{2}}}$$ But which assumption exactly underlies this so that you get exactly this formula and not any other formula with approximately the same properties?- Ad VanderVen
- Thread
- Assumptions Lorentz Lorentz transformation Transformation
- Replies: 120
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
P
MHB Invariance of Asymmetry under Orthogonal Transformation
Show that the property of asymmetry is invariant under orthogonal similarity transformation- PkayGee
- Thread
- Asymmetry Invariance Orthogonal Transformation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
Time dependent canonical transformation
THe question is pretty simple. I was doing an exercise, in which $$p = \lambda P, Q = \lambda q$$ is a canonical transformation. We can check it by $$\{Q,P \} = 1$$ But, if we add $$t' = \lambda ^2 t$$, the question says that the transformation is not canonical anymore. I am a little...- LCSphysicist
- Thread
- Canonical transformation Time Time dependent Transformation
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
A
I Transformation of connection coefficients
I don't understand why the highlighted term is there. This image was taken from Sean Carroll's notes available here: preposterousuniverse.com/wp-content/uploads/grnotes-three.pdf- accdd
- Thread
- Coefficients Connection Transformation
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
I Applying Reisenbach Transf. to EM Wave in Microwave Oven
There is no possible measurement, no matter how clever, that can measure the one way speed of light. It is a synchronization convention. In this topic I would like to apply this idea on a specific case. I have a microwave oven with width L. In this oven I have a standing wave. $$E(t,x)=E...- wnvl2
- Thread
- Applied Em Em wave Microwave oven Transformation Wave
- Replies: 16
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
Energy change under point transformation
How do the energy and generalized momenta change under the following coordinate transformation $$q= f(Q,t)$$The generalized momenta: $$P = \partial L / \partial \dot Q = \partial L / \partial \dot q\times \partial \dot q / \partial \dot Q = p \partial \dot q / \partial \dot Q = p \partial q /...- LCSphysicist
- Thread
- Change Energy Energy change Point Transformation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
Understanding Velocity Transformation
I have used velocity transformation ibut a little confused on it so do solve the problem- Zeeshan Ahmad
- Thread
- Transformation Velocity Velocity transformation
- Replies: 8
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
H
Sifting property of a Dirac delta inverse Mellin transformation
Hi, I have to verify the sifting property of ##\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{-i\infty}^{i\infty} e^{-sa}e^{st} ds## which is the inverse Mellin transformation of the Dirac delta function ##f(t) = \delta(t-a) ##. let ##s = iw## and ##ds = idw## ##\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-iwa}e^{iwt}...- happyparticle
- Thread
- Delta Dirac Dirac delta Inverse Property Transformation
- Replies: 31
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
I Deriving Lorentz Transformations: Hyperbolic Functions
While deriving Lorentz transformation equations, my professor assumes the following: As ##\beta \rightarrow 1,## $$-c^2t^2 + x^2 = k$$ approaches 0. That is, ##-c^2t^2 + x^2 = 0.## But the equation of the hyperbola is preserved in all inertial frames of reference. Why would ##-c^2t^2 + x^2##...- Samama Fahim
- Thread
- deriving Functions Hyperbolic Hyperbolic functions Lorents transformations Lorentz Lorentz boost Lorentz transformation Special relativity Transformation
- Replies: 33
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
A
A Finding the Hermitian generator of a Symplectic transformation
Consider a set of ##n## position operators and ##n## momentum operator such that $$\left[q_{i},p_{j}\right]=i\delta_{ij}.$$ Lets now perform a linear symplectic transformation $$q'_{i} =A_{ij}q_{j}+B_{ij}p_{j},$$ $$p'_{i} =C_{ij}q_{j}+D_{ij}p_{j}.$$ such that the canonical commutation...- andresB
- Thread
- Generator Hermitian Symplectic Transformation
- Replies: 17
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Computing the infinitesimal generators for the Mobius transformation
I don't know where to start. I understand that the constraint ##ad-bc=1## gives us one less parameter since ##d=1+bc/a##. So we can rewrite our original function. I know how to compute the generators of matrix groups but in this case the generators will be functions. I also know there should be...- platypi
- Thread
- Computing Generators Infinitesimal Transformation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help