0.2 percent offset for computing the yield point

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the yield point of a metal using a true stress vs. true strain plot. The participant identified a yield point of approximately 1500 MPa based on visual analysis, while the 0.2% offset method suggested a yield point of around 1235 MPa. The discrepancy arises from the interpretation of the graph and the definition of yield point, which is clarified as the point where significant plastic deformation begins. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting stress-strain curves and understanding the material properties involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of true stress vs. true strain concepts
  • Familiarity with yield point definitions and calculations
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically metals
  • Experience with graphical data interpretation in material science
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the 0.2% offset yield strength method in material testing
  • Study the differences between elastic and plastic deformation in metals
  • Learn about stress-strain curve analysis techniques
  • Investigate common materials with yield points in the 1200-1500 MPa range, such as chromoly steel
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for materials scientists, mechanical engineers, and students involved in material testing and analysis, particularly those focusing on yield point determination and stress-strain relationships in metals.

svishal03
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
I need to compute the yield point for an experimental true stress vs true strain plot of a material as attached in the screenshot.

See attached;

I have true stress vs true strain plot. I took some initial points on the curve and fitted a straight line which gives me the elastic part of the curve.

I constructed a line parallel to this straight line (parallel line has same slope as straight line, I got the constant of y = mx + c of the parallel line by putting x =0.002 when y = 0).

But from the graph it is evident that yield point is around 1500 MPa but the offset method gives me a yield point around 1235 MPa.

Please can anyone suggets/help what is going wrong?
 

Attachments

  • 0_pt_2_percent_offset.JPG
    0_pt_2_percent_offset.JPG
    19.5 KB · Views: 1,258
Engineering news on Phys.org
svishal03 said:
But from the graph it is evident that yield point is around 1500 MPa but the offset method gives me a yield point around 1235 MPa.

Why is it evident it occurs at 1500 MPa? It seems to me that 1500 MPa is approximately 2% yield (if the units on the x-axis are decimal percentages). Remember that 0.2% yield is a pretty small deviation from the linear region.

What material are you testing?
 
The units on x-axis are not percentages.

I say that it is evident that yielding occurs at 1500MPa. because at yielding material just flows.

We can also say that one gets yield point by joining origina with breaking point (this getting a line) and then drawing a line parallel to this line such that the line drawn parallel is tangent to the stress strain curve.This point where the parallel line is tangent is the yield point (http://composite.about.com/library/glossary/y/bldef-y6168.htm).

From the graph it looks that 'flowing' occurs at around 1500MPa definitely not 1235
 
The material is a metal
 
svishal03 said:
The units on x-axis are not percentages.

OK, so it's strain then.
svishal03 said:
I say that it is evident that yielding occurs at 1500MPa. because at yielding material just flows.

The 0.2% yield number is meant to be the boundary of the material's linear elastic region. I would say the material is well into the yield region by 1500 MPa, because there is significant (to the eye) plastic deformation occurring. If you loaded the sample to 1500 MPa and then released, you would see permanent deformation after just one cycle.

svishal03 said:
From the graph it looks that 'flowing' occurs at around 1500MPa definitely not 1235

Be that as it may, it looks to me like there is significant plastic deformation by 1500 MPa, so I would say your estimated 0.2% offset is correct.

svishal03 said:
The material is a metal

OK, well that's not very helpful. Whatever it is it's pretty strong stuff with yield in the 1235 MPa regime (chromoly steel maybe?) I ask because it would be nice to be able to compare published values to your calculated value and see if you're in the ballpark...
 
You really should make the pic show more about the elastic area. No need to have the strain go up to 0,5 if you're studying the area of up to 0,005 or something.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
90K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
88K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K