0 = 3[cos(35)*cos(A) - sin(35)*sin(A)] - cos(A)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fresh4Christ
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 0 = 3[cos(35)*cos(A) - sin(35)*sin(A)] - cos(A) simplifies to tan(A) = [cos(35) - 1/3] / sin(35). To derive this, the equation is rearranged by dividing by cos(A), allowing separation of tan(A) from other terms. The manipulation leads to the expression cos(A)(cos(35) - 1/3) = sin(35)sin(A). Further division by sin(35) results in the final form of tan(A). The discussion concludes with gratitude for the assistance received.
Fresh4Christ
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have the problem:

0 = 3[cos(35)*cos(A) - sin(35)*sin(A)] - cos(A)
where A is alpha...my unknown degree.

somehow that turns into this:

tan(A) = [cos(35) - 1/3] / sin(35)

I am not drawing the connection or seeing how that is happening...

Could you help? THANKS
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looking at the form we want, the first thing to do is divide by cos(A). Then at that point it is possible to separate tan(A) from the other terms.
 
Rearrange to give

cos(35).cos(A) - \frac{cos(A)}{3} = sin(35)sin(A)

cos(A)(cos(35) - \frac{1}{3}) = sin(35).sin(A)

divide both sides by cos(A) to give

(cos(35) - \frac{1}{3}) = sin(35).tan(A)

divide both sides by sin(35) to give

\frac{(cos(35) - \frac{1}{3})}{sin(35)} = tan(A)
 
Last edited:
oops, that y should be A

EDIT: ignore that
 
Last edited:
Thank you soooo much!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top