Calculating Concentrations in a 1.0-L Buffer Solution with Added HCl

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ki-nana18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buffer
AI Thread Summary
To determine the concentrations of HNO2 and NaNO3 in a 1.0-L buffer solution after adding 1.8 g of HCl, the initial concentrations were 0.105 M for HNO2 and 0.180 M for NaNO3. The addition of 1.8 g of HCl equates to approximately 0.0494 mol, which affects the buffer's pH and the concentrations of the components. The correct approach involves careful calculation of the changes in concentrations rather than simple subtraction or addition. The final concentrations after adjusting for the HCl addition were confirmed to be different from the initial calculations, highlighting the importance of accurate mathematical execution. This discussion emphasizes the need for precise calculations in buffer solution chemistry.
Ki-nana18
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1.0-L buffer solution is 0.105 M in HNO2 and 0.180 M in NaNO3. Determine the concentrations of HNO2 and NaNO3 after addition of 1.8 g HCl.

Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


I turned 1.8 g of HCl into mols and got 0.0494 mol of HCl. I subtracted this number from .105 M to find the new concentration of HNO2 and got 0.154 M. For NaNO3 I added 0.0494 and got 0.229 M but these answers were wrong. So what is the process to solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Technically speaking HNO2/NO3- mixture is not a buffer.
 


It's supposed to be NaNO2.
 


Ki-nana18 said:
got 0.0494 mol of HCl. I subtracted this number from .105 M (...) and got 0.154 M.

Check your math and pay more attention to what you add/subtract. Idea is - in general - OK, but the execution is horrible.
 


I got the right answers, thank you for your help. :approve:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top