1-dimensional problem in Newtonian gravity- HELP

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a 1-dimensional problem in Newtonian gravity, specifically calculating the time it takes for a body of mass m to fall into the sun from a distance r. The initial equation of motion is derived from gravitational force, leading to an expression for velocity that requires further integration to find time. Participants suggest using Kepler's laws and substitutions to simplify the integration process, while also discussing the challenges of solving the resulting differential equations. A specific approach involving energy equations and variable substitutions is proposed, indicating the complexity of the integration involved. The conversation highlights various methods and insights into tackling this gravitational problem effectively.
Romeo
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
1-dimensional problem in Newtonian gravity- HELP!

The problem is this:

Given sun of mass M and a body of mass m (M>>m) a distance r from the sun, find the time for the body to 'fall' into the sun (initially ignoring the radius of the sun).


Our first equation is therefore \frac {d^2r}{dt^2} = \ddot{r} = \frac {GM}{r^2}.

I am able to integrate this, giving:
\dot{r} = - {\sqrt{2GM}}{\sqrt{1/r - 1/R}},

where R is the inital distance of the body from the sun. However, I am unable to integrate this again. I have shoved it into wolfram's integrator for an indicator of what to aim for, but cannot come close.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Regards

Romeo
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You can think of this as a zero-width elliptical orbit, so you can use Kepler's law relating the orbital period to the length semi-major axis, and then take 1/4 of the orbital period of any orbit with the same semi-major axis.

If you insist on carrying out the integration, my textbook also suggests the substition

r = a(1-e*cos(psi))

in this case I think the eccentricity, e would be 1, so you'd have

r = a(1 - cos(psi))

I haven't tried this out, though.
 
Thank you pervect, it's an approach I hadn't considered.

Regards

Romeo
 
Aah, the triple post.
This has already been solved in Diff-eq.
 
Here is my try at it. Can you check for errors?
A rock is dropped from r_0 and falls straight down to R.
How long does it take. Where R is Earth radius and r_0 >> R.

The gravity force equation F= \frac{GMm}{r^2} ,

integrates to a specific energy equation W= -\frac{u}{r}.

The velocity at some intermediate r is given by:

V=\sqrt{V_0^2+\frac{2u}{r} -\frac{2u}{r_0}} .

This is a hard differential equation to solve for r(t). I believe I have a form which resembles your integral.

Change of symbols:

A=2u,\ \ \ \ B = -\frac{2u}{r_0},\ \ \ \ V_0=0

V(r) = \sqrt{\frac{A}{r}+B}= \frac{dr}{dt}

Now the part which I have never trusted.

\frac{dt}{dr}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{r}+B}}

Then \int_R^r dt= \int_\frac{A}{R}^\frac{A}{r} \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{r}+B}}\ \ dr

So T = \int_\frac{A}{R}^\frac{A}{r} \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{r}+B}}\ \ dr

A change of variables \frac{A}{r}=x,\ \ r=\frac{A}{x},\ \ dr=\frac{-A}{x^2}dx

<br /> T = \int_\frac{A}{R}^\frac{A}{r} \frac{\frac{-A}{x^2}}{\sqrt{x+B}}\ \ dx = -A \left[ \frac{-\sqrt{B+x}}{Bx} -\frac{1}{2B} \left( \frac{2}{\sqrt{-B}} \arctan{ \sqrt{\frac{B+x}{-B}}} \right) \right]_\frac{A}{R}^\frac{A}{r}

= \left[ \frac{-r_0 \sqrt{x-\frac{2u}{r_0}}}{x} -\frac{2r_0}{\sqrt{\frac{2u}{r_0}}} \arctan{\sqrt{\frac{x-\frac{2u}{r_0}}{\frac{2u}{r_0}}}} \right]_\frac{2u}{R}^\frac{2u}{r_0} =<br />

= \frac{-r_0 \sqrt{\frac{2u}{r_0}-\frac{2u}{r_0}}}{\frac{2u}{r_0}} -\sqrt{\frac{2}{u}} r_0^\frac{3}{2} \arctan{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{2u}{r_0}-\frac{2u}{r_0}}{\frac{2u}{r_0}}}} \ <br /> +\ \frac{r_0 \sqrt{\frac{2u}{R}-\frac{2u}{r_0}}}{\frac{2u}{R}} +\sqrt{\frac{2}{u}} r_0^\frac{3}{2} \arctan{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{2u}{R}-\frac{2u}{r_0}}{\frac{2u}{r_0}}}}<br />

= \frac{Rr_0}{\sqrt{2u}} \sqrt{\frac{1}{R}-\frac{1}{r_0}}+\sqrt{\frac{2}{u}} r_0^\frac{3}{2} \arctan{\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{R}-1}}= \sqrt{\frac{Rr_0}{2u}} \sqrt{r_0-R} +\sqrt{\frac{2}{u}} r_0^\frac{3}{2} \arctan{\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{R}-1}}
This of course means you have to work the problem backwards usually as an iteration, but I would use a binary search which I found converges rapidly for the Kepler problem. It should be ok here too.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top