B 1 divided by infinity equals zero (always?)

njh
Messages
19
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
1/ infinity = 0, but this seems a simplification.
I understand the mathematics that 1 divided by infinity is virtually zero and so equals zero. I look on the internet and that is the answer that I get. Is this a simplification for early mathematics learning and, if I continue, will I find a more complex answer? The reason that I ask is that I find this a simplification that does not sound right. Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You cannot divide anything by infinity since infinity isn't a number. The notation ##1/\infty =0## is a very sloppy way to write ##\displaystyle{\lim_{n \to \infty}\dfrac{1}{n}=0} ## or whatever else goes to infinity. There is no division by infinity, only the remark that ##\left|\dfrac{1}{n}-0\right|<\varepsilon ## gets arbitrarily small, but not zero.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark, Vanadium 50 and mcastillo356
Thank you (and incidentally, my apologies for not using mathematical notation in my question).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
35
Views
12K
Back
Top