10.7 Small-Sample Inferences Concerning A Population Mean

  • Thread starter Thread starter Little Bear
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean population
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on testing whether the dissolved oxygen content in river water samples is less than the required 5 parts per million (ppm) for aquatic life. Six samples taken during low-water season yielded a sample mean of 4.93 ppm. Calculations for the sum of squares and standard deviation were performed, leading to a t-value of -1.28. The book's answer indicates a t-value of -1.195, suggesting that rounding errors occurred during calculations. Maintaining precision in calculations is essential to align with the expected results.
Little Bear
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Dissolved O2 Content. Industrial wastes and sewage dumped into our rivers and streams absorb oxygen and thereby reduce the amount of dissolved oxygen available for fish and other forms of aquatic life. One state agency requires a minimum of 5 parts per million (ppm) of dissolved oxygen in order for the oxygen content to be sufficient to support aquatic life. Six water specimens taken from a river at a specific location during the low-water season (July) gave readings of 4.9, 5.1, 4.9, 5.0, 5.0 and 4.7 ppm of dissolved oxygen. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the dissolved oxygen content is less than 5 ppm? Test using alpha = .05.

Homework Equations


n = 6
sum of x samples = x1+x2...+xn
ample mean = (x1+ x2...+xn)/n
Sum of squares = x1^2+x2^2+...+xn^2
s^2 = [sum of squares – (sum of x samples)^2/n]/[n-1]
s = sqrt(s^2)
popn mean = 5 (parts ppm)
t = [sample mean – popn mean]/[s/sqrt(n)]

The Attempt at a Solution


sum of x samples = [4.9 + 5.1 + 4.9 + 5.0 + 5.0 + 4.7] = 29.6
sample mean = sum of x samples/6 = 29.6/6 = 4.93
sum of squares(x^2) = [4.9^2+ 5.1^2+ 4.9^2+ 5.0^2+ 5.0^2+ 4.7^2]
= 24.01 + 26.01 + 24.01 + 25 + 25 + 22.09
= 146.12
s^2= [Sum of x^2– (Sum of x samples)^2/n]/[n-1]
= [146.12 – (29.6^2/6)]/[6-1]
= [146.12 – 146.03]/5
= 0.09/5
= 0.018
s = sqrt(0.018)
s = 0.134
t = [sample mean – popn mean]/[s/sqrt(n)]
= [4.93 – 5]/[0.134/sqrt(6)]
= -0.07/0.0547
= -1.28
The answer at the back of the book is:
No; t = -1.195.
So, what did I do wrong in my calculations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You rounded too early. If you hold all your calculations to more decimal places you will get the book's answer.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top