Can you solve the equation 100! - 99!?

  • Thread starter Thread starter srfriggen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 100! - 99! simplifies to 99! * 99, as shown by substituting x for 99!. The breakdown reveals that 100! equals 100 times 99!, leading to the expression 100x - x, which simplifies to 99x. Further simplification is deemed unnecessary since calculating 99! directly is considered inefficient. The discussion highlights the limitations of factorial operations and the non-distributive nature of the factorial symbol. Ultimately, the solution confirms that 100! - 99! equals 99 times 99!.
srfriggen
Messages
304
Reaction score
7
question: what is 100! - 99!

I've broken it down to a problem like this: Let x=99! Then 100! = 100*99! = 100x. 100x - x=99x = 99*99!.

I can't figure out a way to simplify the problem any more than that.

Thank you in advance for any help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is the obvious: 100!- 99!= 99!(100- 1)= 99!(99).
 
you've got the right answer and I don't see how it COULD be simplified any further except by actually computing 99! which just seems like a waste of time.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=99*99!&dataset=

attachment.php?attachmentid=62587&stc=1&d=1381162058.gif


Edit: lol, too much time spent to attach the image.
 

Attachments

  • MSP30561ighf5hiicdb1hf7000040dc27bhd5799hi0.gif
    MSP30561ighf5hiicdb1hf7000040dc27bhd5799hi0.gif
    4.2 KB · Views: 537
As is seen, "!" does not satisfy the distributive law for operations. :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top