Making \sum Bigger with AMSMATH

  • Thread starter Thread starter skook
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To make the \sum symbol larger in the AMSMATH package, use the command $\displaystyle \sum$ in your TeX file. This command ensures that the summation symbol is displayed in its larger form, enhancing visibility. The difference can be observed when comparing the standard \sum with the larger version. This adjustment is straightforward and improves the overall presentation of mathematical expressions. Proper usage of the AMSMATH package can significantly enhance document formatting.
skook
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
:rolleyes: I am trying to learn how to use the AMSMATH package. Can anyone tell me how to change the size of \sum to make it bigger?
thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
skook said:
:rolleyes: I am trying to learn how to use the AMSMATH package. Can anyone tell me how to change the size of \sum to make it bigger?
thanks
In a TeX file, write $\displaystyle \sum$ rather than $\sum$. This will give you the difference between the following two:

\sum

\sum
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top