What is the solution for 12^x = 18?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation 12^x = 18, one approach is to use logarithms, resulting in x = log(18)/log(12). Another method involves rewriting 12 and 18 in terms of their prime factors, leading to the equations 2 * 3^2 = 3^x * 2^{2x}. However, this method reveals a contradiction, indicating that the assumption of integer exponents is flawed. The discussion highlights that the original equation does not have an integer solution for x. Ultimately, the correct interpretation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of the properties of exponents in prime factorization.
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi everyone. Here's a simple problem I need help with:


Find x such that 12^x = 18

From one point of view, x = log(18)/log(12) and the problem is solved.

However, if we write 12 as 3*2^2 and 18 as 3^2*2 then,

(2 * 3^2) = 3^x * 2^{2x}

and hence by the uniqueness of prime factorization (in particular that of the exponents of the prime factors),

x = 2
and 2x = 1

but these equations do not have a consistent solution. I think the error is in the second reasoning.


Can someone help please?

Cheers
Vivek
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can only guarantee unique factorization if you have integral exponents. When you try to invoke the fundamental theorem of arithmetic you would also need the assumption that the exponents x and 2x are integers. Your contradiction only tells you that there is no integer x that satisfies the original equation.
 
Thanks Shmoe.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-sln2)+e^(-sln3)+e^(-sln4)+... , Re(s)>1 If we regards it as some function got from Laplace transformation, and let this real function be ζ(x), that means L[ζ(x)]=ζ(s), then: ζ(x)=L^-1[ζ(s)]=δ(x)+δ(x-ln2)+δ(x-ln3)+δ(x-ln4)+... , this represents a series of Dirac delta functions at the points of x=0, ln2, ln3, ln4, ... , It may be still difficult to understand what ζ(x) means, but once it is integrated, the truth is clear...
Back
Top