2.45GHz RF microstrip Transmission Line design

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the design of a 2.45GHz RF microstrip transmission line for a PCB, addressing questions about transmission line length, impedance matching, and layer configurations within an 8-layer PCB. Participants explore design guidelines and considerations for effective transmission line layout.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the minimum length of the transmission line and how to calculate it, noting their ability to determine the width for 50-ohm impedance but seeking guidance on length.
  • Another participant suggests that if the transmission line is used to transmit energy efficiently to a matched load, the line length may not be important, indicating there is no minimum length in that context.
  • Conversely, they mention that if the line is used with open or short termination to emulate capacitive or inductive behavior, the line length becomes critical and must be adjusted for the velocity factor due to the PCB's dielectric constant.
  • Participants discuss the importance of having the return path of the transmission line directly below it for effective isolation, with one suggesting that striplines provide better isolation than coplanar waveguides.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential issues with vias at high frequencies, specifically mentioning the need to consider their geometry to avoid mismatches in the transmission line.
  • Questions are posed regarding the material used for the PCB, including surface roughness and dielectric loss, highlighting the complexity of determining an effective stack-up.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the importance of transmission line length depending on the application, indicating that multiple competing perspectives exist regarding design considerations for the transmission line.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not reach a consensus on the minimum length of the transmission line or the optimal layer configuration for the ground plane, reflecting the complexity and variability of PCB design factors.

spid3rx
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I'm now working on the 2.45GHz frequency transmission line layout on the PCB.
I would like to know whether there is a design guideline for the

1) minimum length of the transmission line. how do I know or calculate? I can calculate the width of the TL to get the 50ohm impedance based on which layer for the ground plane, but length? how?

2) the PCB is 8 layer type, is there a good rule to have for the TL ground to be on which layer? can I calculate the TL width on layer 2 ground and layer 4 ground ? mixture of both, and the TL width will be different.

thanks.
spid3rx
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can run the line on the surface above a ground plane =microstrip, with some stray radiation and sensitivity to the environment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microstrip

You can place the line between two ground planes with vias to tie the planes = stripline, which has low radiation and well controlled impedance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stripline

If the transmission line is being used to transmit energy efficiently to a matched load, the waveform and line length will not be important, there is no minimum length.

If the line is being used with an open or short termination to emulate C, L or a resonant filter, then the line length is critical and the signal needs to be a sinewave. The physical length will need to be sdjusted for the velocity factor due to PCB dielectric constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tech99
It's definitely a good idea to have the return path of the transmission line right below it. I've seen coplanar waveguides (CPW) without a back plate although I cannot think of any good reason to use it if you're going to have 8 metal layers. Striplines as stated above will have its return paths above and below it, and this'll provide good isolation from traces on the other layers.

I have heard of vias causing problems at 3 GHz, but I'm not so sure about 2.45 GHz. You might want to pay attention to its geometry because it could create a mismatch between your two "matched" lines, which will ultimately make your load look mismatched.

What kind of material are you using? Surface roughness? Dielectric loss? Determining a stack-up is very challenging work. What else is going to be on your board?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tech99

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K