2 definitions for voltage, how are they equivalent?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the two definitions of potential difference (voltage) in electrostatics, specifically how the expressions for voltage between two points A and B can be seen as equivalent despite their differing signs. Participants explore the implications of these definitions and the importance of reference points in measuring voltage.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how both expressions for voltage can represent the potential difference between points A and B, given their differing signs.
  • It is noted that the sign of the potential difference depends on the reference point chosen, leading to the equation ##V_a - V_b = - (V_b - V_a)##.
  • Participants question whether using both definitions will yield the same result or symmetric results, with some suggesting that the second expression should represent the potential difference from point B to A.
  • There is a clarification that ##U## represents the voltage between points A and B, but it is emphasized that the expressions cannot both equal ##U## simultaneously unless ##U=0##.
  • Some participants argue that voltage should always be expressed with reference to which point is considered the ground or reference point, suggesting that the terms "the voltage between points A and B" can be misleading.
  • An analogy is made comparing voltage to altitude differences, highlighting that stating a difference does not clarify which point is higher or lower.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of the two equations suggesting that they imply equal values for ##U##, which is not the case.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that both expressions for voltage are correct but do not agree on how they relate to each other, leading to an unresolved discussion about their equivalence and the importance of reference points.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity in defining voltage with respect to reference points, as the ambiguity in expressions can lead to misunderstandings about the nature of potential differences.

Granger
Messages
165
Reaction score
7
So I'm studying electrostatics and I came across to two different definitions of potential difference/voltage (because we're in stationary regimes) and I'm having trouble understanding how the expressions are equivalent.

They are for a voltage between point A and point B

$$U=V_a - V_b =\int_{a}^{b} \textbf{E} \cdot d\textbf{s}$$

and, on the other hand,

$$U= V_b - V_a = - \int_{a}^{b} \textbf{E} \cdot d\textbf{s}$$

How can both of this expressions represent the potential difference between points A and B? Aren't they symmetric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite sure I understand the question.
Granger said:
How can both of this expressions represent the potential difference between points A and B?
The sign of the potential difference depends on which point you're measuring with respect to:
##V_a - V_b = - (V_b - V_a)##
 
Doc Al said:
Not quite sure I understand the question.

The sign of the potential difference depends on which point you're measuring with respect to:
##V_a - V_b = - (V_b - V_a)##

My question is that in both cases the expression is presented as "the potential difference between points a and b". However if I use both definitions will I obtain the same result or will I obtain symmetric results? I'm thinking the later is probably the correct one but now that leaves me with other question: shouldn't the second expression be the potential difference between points b and a?
 
Granger said:
$$U=V_a - V_b =\int_{a}^{b} \textbf{E} \cdot d\textbf{s}$$

What does ##U## stand for?

and, on the other hand,

$$U= V_b - V_a = - \int_{a}^{b} \textbf{E} \cdot d\textbf{s}$$

##V_b-V_a \neq V_a-V_b## except for the trivial case of ##V_a=V_b##.
 
Mister T said:
What does ##U## stand for?
##V_b-V_a \neq V_a-V_b## except for the trivial case of ##V_a=V_b##.

U is the voltage between points a and b.

Exactly that's my doubt, are both expressions correct?
 
$$V_a - V_b =\int_{a}^{b} \textbf{E} \cdot d\textbf{s}$$

and,

$$V_b - V_a = - \int_{a}^{b} \textbf{E} \cdot d\textbf{s}$$

But they cannot both be equal to ##U## at the same time, except when ##U=0##.
 
Granger said:
U=Va−Vb=∫baE⋅ds

Granger said:
U=Vb−Va=−∫baE⋅ds

Granger said:
How can both of this expressions represent the potential difference between points A and B?

Granger said:
U is the voltage between points a and b.
Consider:
If you a 1 meter long stick and a 1.5 meter long stick, isn't the absolute difference between them the same regardless of how you do the length comparison?
 
Granger said:
U is the voltage between points a and b.

Exactly that's my doubt, are both expressions correct?
They are both correct, but they are not equal to each other. The thing with voltages is that it is a directed difference. Strictly speaking you should never write just voltage ##U##. It should always be written more clearly ##U_{ab}=-U_{ba}##. You need to always specify which point is being considered to be the reference or the “ground”.

Granger said:
U is the voltage between points a and b
There is no such thing as “the voltage between points a and b”. There is “the voltage at a with respect to b” and “the voltage at b with respect to a”. Often in context which point is used as reference/ground is clear, so it may not always be stated so precisely, but that is the meaning.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
Granger said:
U is the voltage between points a and b.

That's not a definition because it could refer to ##V_b-V_a## or ##V_a-V_b## or ##|{V_b-V_a}|##.

It's like referring to an altitude between two points. For example, if you have an altitude difference of 10 meters between points a and b you don't know if the altitude at point b is 10 meters greater than the altitude at point a or the other way around. Saying that the altitude between them is 10 meters doesn't tell us which of those to choose. And saying that the absolute value of the difference is 10 meters doesn't tell us, either.
 
  • #10
Tom.G said:
Consider:
If you a 1 meter long stick and a 1.5 meter long stick, isn't the absolute difference between them the same regardless of how you do the length comparison?

Yes, but knowing only that the difference is 0.5 meters doesn't tell us which of the two items is longer. And it certainly doesn't imply that ##1.5-1.0## is equal to ##1.0-1.5##. But that is indeed what the OP's two equations imply about the value of ##U##.
 
  • #11
Mister T said:
doesn't tell us which of the two items is longer.
Agreed.
I also agree that the polarity is often, but not always important. (re: active devices vs resistive heater)

However, the OPs question was:
Granger said:
...definitions of potential difference...
With no reference to polarity. That was the question I was trying to answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K