2 dimensional collision modeling

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yaridovich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Modeling
AI Thread Summary
In developing a 2D physics simulation, key considerations include the conservation of horizontal and vertical momentum, kinetic energy, and angular momentum during collisions. The challenge lies in determining the post-collision velocities and angular velocities, which results in six unknowns needing resolution. The duration of the collision is a critical parameter affecting energy transfer and angular momentum, complicating the calculations. A realistic approach involves computing forces at each simulation step, allowing for accurate accounting of kinetic and static friction and energy losses. This method mitigates issues associated with multiple body collisions and provides a more manageable framework for simulating interactions.
Yaridovich
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have been working on making a 2-dimensional physics simulation on my computer and am having a bit of trouble with collisions. I know that:

-horizontal momentum is conserved
-vertical momentum is conserved
-kinetic energy (both rotation and translational) is conserved (assuming elastic collision)
-angular momentum is conserved

I have also created another equation that determines the angle at which the objects are deflected. That leaves me with 5 equations, but I need to know:

-horizontal velocity after collision (for both objects)
-vertical velocity after collision (for both)
-angular velocity (for both), which leaves me with 6 unknowns.

How else can I relate these variables so that I can solve for them explicitly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to solve the following:

Let v_1 and u_1 be the velocities before the collision. v_2 and u_2 are the velocities after the collision. m and M are the masses of the objects.

Solve the following for motion in both x and y:

mv_1+Mu_1=mv_2+Mu_2

v_1+v_2=u_1+u_2

Angular velocities are more comlpcated and depend on the shapes of the objects, where and from what angle the collision happens, but the conservation law is:

Let \alpha_1 and \beta_1 be the angular velocities before the collision. \alpha_2 and \beta_2 are the angular velocities after the collision. i and I are the moments of inertia of the objects about their centres of mass.

i\alpha_1+I\beta_1=i\alpha_2+I\beta_2
 
The parameter you are missing is duration of the collision. Without it, you cannot gauge how much energy goes into rotation.

In a perfectly elastic instant collision, no rotation is transfered*, so both objects will keep angular momentum. But I'm sure that's not what you want. A more realistic collision has a finite duration, and the angular momentum transferred is basically given by torque from kinetic friction at point of collision over the duration of collision, but no more than needed fore angular velocities to match. You'll have to figure out what that does in terms of energy loss, of course, as well as momentum transfer in tangential direction.

Then you have a headache of figuring out how much of the duration was spent in kinetic friction and how much in static friction modes.

All that headache, plus a lot of problems with many-body-collisions is the main reason people usually don't do that in simulation. Instead, they compute actual forces acting on body at every step of the simulation, each collision taking up a significant number of steps. That way you can always check if you have kinetic or static friction, account for energy losses directly, and not be in any sort of trouble if object collided with two others at once.

* I assumed circular boundary here. For a general boundary, you'll have angular momentum exchange even in perfectly elastic collision, of course, but you shouldn't have trouble computing that.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top