1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

2 Metric tensor question~

  1. Nov 3, 2005 #1
    Q1 If given a 2D Riemannian space, ds^2 = dx^2 + x^2dy^2, do the componets of the metric tensor are these:
    g_11 = 1, g_12 = 0
    g_21 = o, g_22 = x^2 ?

    In addition, I got a question from my lecturer:
    Q2. 2 metrics, defined in a Riemannian space, are given by ds^2 = g_ijdx^idy^j
    and ds'^2 = g'_ij dx^idy^j = e^z g_ijdx^idy^j , respectively, where z is a function of the coordinates x^i.
    Find the relation between the Chritoffel symbols corresponding to the 2 two metrics~~~
    I have no ideal how to solve it and what is e here? treat it as a function or is it represents the persudo tensor????

    Can any one help me~~

    yukyuk
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 3, 2005 #2
    Yes, this is correct.

    I assume you mean: [itex]ds^2 = g_{ij}dx^idx^j[/itex] and [itex]ds'^2 = g'_{ij}dx^idx^j = e^z g_{ij}dx^idx^j[/itex]. (Note that I have replaced references to [itex]y^j[/itex] with references to [itex]x^j[/itex].)

    The [itex]e^z[/itex] here is the exponential function. Note that its partial derivatives are (,i is shorthand for [itex]\partial / \partial x^i[/itex]):

    [itex]e^z{}_{,i} = z_{,i}e^z[/itex]

    The formula for the Christoffel symbol in terms of the metric tensor is:

    [itex]\Gamma^m{}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}g^{km}(g_{ik,j} + g_{jk,i} - g_{ij,k})[/itex]

    This should be enough to get you started. If you still have trouble, post again.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2005
  4. Nov 3, 2005 #3
    To jimmysnyder:

    Hope I can understand what you mean~~
    I work out the steps, am I correct?

    [itex]\Gamma^m{}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}g^{km} (-g_{ij,k}+g_{jk,i}+g_{ki,j})[/itex]
    [itex]\Gamma'^m{}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}g'^{km} (-g'_{ij,k}+g'_{jk,i}+g'_{ki,j})[/itex]
    [itex]\Gamma'^m{}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}e^{z(i)}g^{km} (-e^{z(i)}g_{ij,k}+e^{z(i)}g_{jk,i}+e^{z(i)}g_{ki,j}[/itex]
    [itex]\Gamma'^m{}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}e^{z(i)}g^km{}[-e^{z(i)}g_{ij,k}+z(i)_{,i}e^{z(i)}g_{jk,i}+e^{z(i)}g_{jk,i}+e^{z(i)}g_{ki,j}][/itex]
    [itex]\Gamma'^m{}_{ij} = e^{2z(i)}[\Gamma^m{}_{ij} + \frac{1}{2}g^{km}z(i)_{,i}g_{jk,i}][/itex]

    Thx so much and you are so smart that you can correct my mistake as what i want to write is dx^j not dy^j~

    yukyuk
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2005
  5. Nov 3, 2005 #4
    So far, so good.

    The exponential factor that goes with [itex]g^{km}[/itex] should be [itex]e^{-z}[/itex], because you want [itex]g'^{np}g'_{pm} = \delta^n{}_m[/itex]. Also in order to make things more clear, I would remove the parameter from z and add parentheses as follows:
    [itex]\Gamma'^m{}_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}e^{-z}g^{km} (-(e^{z}g_{ij})_{,k} + (e^{z}g_{jk})_{,i} + (e^{z}g_{ki})_{,j})[/itex]

    The next steps are not correct, but if you start from the equation I have given you, I think you can get the rest.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2005
  6. Nov 3, 2005 #5
    Once more question is :

    Given a fame S' which is falling along -z-axis with constant acceleration in an inertial frame S. Find a form of metric in the S' frame, assume in Newtonian approximation of the absolute time (t=t').

    I just know a definition that
    a = sqrt(g_ij dx^idx^j) but how to get the g_ij??

    yukyuk
     
  7. Nov 3, 2005 #6
    I think my answer is correct~~
    as z is only a function of coordinate x^i , derative of z wrt x^j & x^k will be zero ~ right? Do I make the mistake there?
     
  8. Nov 3, 2005 #7
    Yes, you have made a mistake. In this case, i is an index that takes all 4 values, 0, 1, 2, and 3. In your original post you have written "z is a function of the coordinates x^i". Note coordinates, not coordinate. That means it is a function of all 4 coordinates and partials must be taken with respect to each of them. The letters k and j are just different index letters that also take on the 4 values 0, 1, 2, and 3.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2005
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: 2 Metric tensor question~
  1. Metric Tensor question (Replies: 2)

  2. Metric tensor (Replies: 5)

  3. Metric tensor (Replies: 10)

Loading...