MHB *2 values of x for perpendicular vectors

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
The vectors $$\left(\frac{2x}{x-3}\right)$$ and $$\left(\frac{x+1}{5}\right)$$ are $$\perp$$ for $$2$$ values of $$x $$

what is the quadratic equation which the 2 values of x satisfy

well I got $$2x^2+7x-15$$ which gives $$x=-5$$ and $$x=\frac{3}{2}$$
-5 seems to work but
$$\frac{3}{2}$$ doesn't or is there another way to do this.

thanks ahead,
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: 2 values of x for perpendicular vectors

karush said:
The vectors $$\left(\frac{2x}{x-3}\right)$$ and $$\left(\frac{x+1}{5}\right)$$ are $$\perp$$ for $$2$$ values of $$x $$

what is the quadratic equation which the 2 values of x satisfy

well I got $$2x^2+7x-15$$ which gives $$x=-5$$ and $$x=\frac{3}{2}$$
-5 seems to work but
$$\frac{3}{2}$$ doesn't or is there another way to do this.

thanks ahead,

Hi karush! :)

What is the reason you think $x=\frac 3 2$ does not work?
It is a proper solution.
 
Re: 2 values of x for perpendicular vectors

when I plugged $$\frac{3}{2}$$ in the slopes didn't seem $$\perp$$
 
Re: 2 values of x for perpendicular vectors

karush said:
when I plugged $$\frac{3}{2}$$ in the slopes didn't seem $$\perp$$

Well... which vectors do you get if you plug it in?
 
Re: 2 values of x for perpendicular vectors

OK found my error...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top