Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around expectations and opinions regarding the upcoming 2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Participants share thoughts on potential discoveries and candidates that may be recognized, exploring various contributions in the field of chemistry and its intersections with biology.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express curiosity about interesting discoveries in chemistry that could merit a Nobel Prize this year.
- One participant provides a schedule for the announcement of the Nobel Prizes, highlighting the specific dates for each category.
- There are suggestions for potential candidates, including Doudna and Charpentier for CRISPR, Deisseroth and Boyden for optogenetics, and Allis, Schreiber, and Grunstein for histone modifications, with varying opinions on their suitability.
- Another participant mentions the need for more external sources to support predictions.
- A participant notes an upcoming webcast by Chemistry and Engineering News that will discuss predictions for the Chemistry Nobel Prize.
- One participant confirms that the announcement is imminent, occurring the following day.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on specific predictions or candidates for the Nobel Prize, with multiple competing views and suggestions presented throughout the discussion.
Contextual Notes
Some claims about potential candidates are based on personal opinions and may not reflect broader consensus or established criteria for the Nobel Prize.