2018 Russia / 2022 Qatar World Cup

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    world cup
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the controversial selection of Qatar and Russia as World Cup venues, with many expressing disbelief over Qatar's choice due to its lack of soccer history, extreme summer heat, and restrictive social policies like the prohibition of public drinking. Concerns are raised about the suitability of these countries for hosting the tournament, particularly regarding the infrastructure and climate challenges, as temperatures can exceed 120°F. Many participants argue that England, with its established football culture and infrastructure, would have been a more logical choice. The conversation also touches on the financial implications for Qatar, questioning whether they can sustain the costs associated with hosting the World Cup. Corruption in the bidding process is a recurring theme, with suggestions that FIFA members may have been influenced by bribery, leading to the selection of venues that lack a strong footballing tradition. Overall, there is skepticism about the viability and enjoyment of the World Cup in these locations, particularly for players and fans.
Greg Bernhardt
Admin
Insights Author
Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,725
For you soccer fans I want to hear your thoughts on the new world cup venues just announced.

Personally I can handle Russia even though I can't believe they beat out Spain/Portugal. But Qatar is beyond my imagination. It must be corruption.

1. Qatar has zero soccer history.
2. It's in a fairly high risk environment.
3. Summer heat gets to 120F. Tourists won't be able to venture outside.
4. No public drinking.
5. Can you imagine how badly the Qatar national team will play?

The UAE would have been a better choice. I've been to Doha Qatar and it is nice for a day in "winter", but overall I've had more fun in a cornfield in Iowa. Qatar beat out Australia. Now that would have been a great time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed it is going to be horrible, but were you actually planning on going?
if no one goes the mistake these guys made will be obvious

I feel worst for the Players... they have to go
 
hmmm...Qatar doesn't sound a good choice to me as well. However we're talking about 2022 and who knows? Maybe everything would change even the hot weather.:-p
 
Qatar have the money!

I don't understand how the results went this way: Russia now have to build 18 new stadia and Qatar are building 22, all to be destroyed after the world cup. Neither are footballing countries. England, on the other hand, has all the stadia in place, some used to dealing with nearly 80,000 fans safely on a weekly basis, has the infrastructure to enable fans to get from one stadium to another without having to take a three or four hour flight and is a country that live and breathe football, if not the home of football.

Of course, it's clear why England didn't win the bid since the British media actually investigate corruption and don't cover it up.
 
cristo said:
Russia now have to build 18 new stadia and Qatar are building 22, all to be destroyed after the world cup. Neither are footballing countries.

A case can be made that Russia has the potential to be a footballing nation. But Qatar, never. Qatar has the money now, but 2022 who knows. They may end up in some real financial trouble by the end.
 
I'm stunned by both choices.

In the case of Russia, it's only because England would have been the safe bet - the infrastructure is already in place to ensure a profitable World Cup. All would be decent choices.

I'm really shocked by the choice of Qatar. Temperatures over 100 degrees are going to be brutal. I take it all of the games will have to be played at night?
 
BobG said:
I'm really shocked by the choice of Qatar. Temperatures over 100 degrees are going to be brutal. I take it all of the games will have to be played at night?

All 22 stadiums to be built will be indoor with A/C along with dozens of training grounds. I was in Doha this past June and it was like walking in a furnace. People will be shuttled from hotel to stadium to hotel. Doesn't sound like fun. Doha has a nice corniche and a great Islamic museum. Other than that, the place is a real bore. I don't get it.
 
But Qatar are really good at football:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
cristo said:
But Qatar are really good at football:

He used the outside of his left foot, lol.
 
  • #10
oh man that guy knows he is totally getting shot after the game ha
 
  • #11
Venue suitability probably has nothing to do with it. The game is about bribing FIFA members to vote a certain way. Twenty two members voting secretly smells bad. England only managing two votes smells bad. By the time 2018/2022 comes around, the lined pockets will be long empty and venue controversies will be somebody elses fault.
 
  • #12
Greg Bernhardt said:
He used the outside of his left foot, lol.
I've done that before, but I would tap from the side rather than behind the ball, and I reduced the forward momentum of the ball. Optionally would have been an inside sidekick with the right foot from behind.

Who knows what Russia will look like in 2018. Qatar has the money, and I think they could pull it off, especially if they have the right kind stadia.
 

Similar threads

News Were FIFA Officials' Arrests the End for Blatter?
Replies
19
Views
3K
2018 [+2022 update] Football World Cup: Russia
Replies
41
Views
5K
What are your thoughts on the 2010 Soccer World Cup Bid?
Replies
22
Views
8K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top