What is the Sum of Digits for 2^1000?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krypton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum Sum of digits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the sum of the digits of 2^1000. A participant highlights a misunderstanding in approximating 2^1000 using logarithms, noting that 1000log(2) is not exactly 301 due to decimal places being ignored. The correct approach involves recognizing that the sum of the digits cannot be derived from the logarithmic approximation alone. For those seeking the single digit reduced sum, working modulo 9 yields an answer of 7. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise calculations in determining the sum of digits.
Krypton
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
What is the sum of the digits of 2^1000
check my algoriathm, let y=2^1000 then logy = 1000log2 = 301 and y=10^logy=10^301
since (1,0) r da only digits of 10^n 4all n=1,2,3,4,... The sum of digits equals 1 , but it is not the answer ...Why?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well you seem to want 2^1000 to be equal to 10^301 which is clearly false since 5 divides the latter but not the former. The issue is that 1000log2 is not exactly equal to 301, you probably left off the decimal places which is the cause of your problem when you equate 10^logy to 2^1000.
 
That 301 is just the number of zeros, since log(2) = .301029996...you are attempting to approximate its value using 1000log(2) = 301.

However the problem can be worked out by looking at the series, 2, 4, 8, 16=7, 32=5, etc.
 
Hay i am not using a computer to calculate it that way. I need some techiques could u pleasezzzz...Z
 
Do you want the actual sum of all the digits in 2^1000 or do you just want the single digit reduced sum (the single digit eventually obtained from repeated summing of digits).

If its the single digit reduced sum that you want then just work modulo 9 to get the answer (which is 7 btw).
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top