Resonant and Non Resonant Susceptibility

n0_3sc
Messages
238
Reaction score
1
The imaginary part of the \chi ^3 susceptibility can be split into the resonant and non resonant contributions.
The resonant is the contribution from satisfying a resonant vibrational state/mode, but what contributes to the non resonant term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
n0_3sc said:
The imaginary part of the \chi ^3 susceptibility can be split into the resonant and non resonant contributions.
The resonant is the contribution from satisfying a resonant vibrational state/mode, but what contributes to the non resonant term?

everything else, apparently. :wink:
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
787
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top