How Do You Calculate the Equilibrium Constant for This Reaction?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the equilibrium constant (K) for the reaction CO2(g) + H2(g) <====> CO(g) + H2O(g), the initial concentrations of water vapor and carbon monoxide are given as 0.25 mol and 0.2 mol, respectively, in a 1.00 L vessel. At equilibrium, 0.1 mol of carbon dioxide is present, which allows for the determination of the changes in concentrations. The stoichiometry indicates that 10 molecules of carbon monoxide reacted with water, leading to the production of hydrogen gas. By applying the equilibrium law Kc = [CO][H2O]/[CO2][H2], the missing concentrations can be calculated to find the value of K.
Malgrif
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the system

CO2(g) + H2(g) <====> CO(g) + H2O(g)

Initially, 0.25 mol of water vapour and 0.2 mol of carbon monoxide are placed in a 1.00 L reaction vessel. At equilibrium, spectroscopic evidence shows that 0.1 mol of carbon dioxide is present. Calculate K for the reaction.



Homework Equations


equilibrium law


The Attempt at a Solution


So writing down the equilibrium law we get.
Kc = [CO][H2O]/[CO2]



Now we need to find the unknowns. We know 3/4 of the reaction's concentrations but how do you find the forth? An ice table won't work since we don't have a Kc value and without a given H2 value we can't calculate Kc. Stoichometry sounds useless since the system is in equilibrium so what the heck. How do you solve this problem?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You were already answered somewhere else, but let me repeat: stoichiometry is a key.

Think this way: you start with 25 molecules of water and 20 molecules of carbon monoxide. At equlibrium you find there are 10 molecules of carbon dixode. There were 20 atoms of carbon in the system - if 10 are in the form of dioxide, other 10 must be still in the form of monoxide. That means that 10 molecules of monoxide reacted with water molecules - stoichiometry of the reaction tells you how many molecules of water reacted and how many molecules of hydrogen were produced.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top